Text Book Solutions All Class

Q1. How did the child react when there was no sign of his parents ?

Ans: The child reacted with innocence and confusion when he couldn’t find his parents. He became panic-stricken and felt profoundly lonely in the crowd. Despite a man’s attempts to console him, the child remained inconsolable, expressing that he only wanted his parents, not any material comforts.

Q2. Where did the child go with his parents ? What did he want there ?

Ans: The child went to a fair with his parents. He wanted garlands, balloons, and sweets there. Additionally, he wished to see the snake and take a ride on the swing.

Q3. Why did the lost child refuse to take his favourite things in the fair after losing his parents ?

Ans: The child refused to take his favourite things at the fair after losing his parents because he missed them deeply. His desire to reunite with them overshadowed any interest he had in the toys and sweets around him.

Q4. How did the mother distract the child’s mind from the toy seller ?

Ans: The mother distracted the child from the toy seller by pointing to a flowering mustard field. The child became captivated by the colourful dragonflies and began to chase after them.

Q5. How was the child separated from his parents ?

Ans: The boy was drawn to the toys, balloons, and sweets at the fair. He became captivated by the music of the snake charmer’s flute. While watching the roundabout, he lost sight of his parents and became separated from them.

Q6. What happened when the lost child reached the temple door ?

Ans: When the child reached the temple door, men were jostling each other. The poor child struggled to push his way through but was knocked about. He might have been trampled if he had not shouted at the top of his lungs.

His yellow turban came undone and his clothes became muddy. After running around in a panic, he stood defeated, his cries turning into sobs. Through his tear-filled eyes, he saw men and women chatting nearby, but he could not find his parents among the crowd.

Desperate, he ran towards a shrine where people were gathering. The crowd was thick near the temple entrance, with heavy men pushing against each other. The child tried to squeeze between their legs, but their movements knocked him around. He cried out for his parents, feeling lost and scared.

Q7. What happened when the “lost child” entered the grove? How did he enjoy it there?

Ans: When the lost child entered the grove, a shower of young flowers fell upon him. He joyfully gathered the petals as they rained down. The soothing cooing of doves caught his attention, prompting him to run towards his parents, excitedly shouting about the doves. He had a delightful time in the grove, filled with laughter and wonder.

Q8. Parents were in a hurry to reach the fair but the child was delaying them. How ?

Ans: The boy was distracted by various things on the way to the fair. He wanted to buy toys, catch butterflies and dragonflies, and gather flowers. His innocent curiosity caused him to delay his parents, making them wait as he explored his surroundings.

Q9. What was the first reaction of the child when he realized that he had lost his parents?

Ans: The child felt a wave of panic when he realised he had lost his parents. Confused and angry, he cried out for them, running in all directions in a desperate search. His tears flowed as he shouted, “Mother, Father!” His clothes became dirty, and he was overwhelmed by fear.

Q10. Why didn’t the boy wait for an answer after he had pleaded for sweets?

Ans: The boy didn’t wait for an answer after pleading for sweets because he anticipated that his parents would call him greedy and refuse to buy them. Understanding their likely response, he moved on without waiting.

Long Answer Type Questions

Q12. What changes do you notice in the behaviour of the child, once he is separated from his parents in the story “The Lost Child” ?

Ans: A child went to a fair with his parents, feeling excited and happy about the toys and sweets. However, when he became separated from them, his behaviour changed drastically. He started to cry and ran around in search of his parents, feeling scared in the crowded place. Despite the offers of sweets and toys from a kind man, he refused them all. The child, who had once wanted everything at the fair, now only longed to be with his parents, highlighting how his priorities shifted from material desires to a deep need for his family.

Q13. Compare the attitude of the child before and after his separation from his parents.

Ans: Before the separation, the child was very happy and excited at the fair. He was captivated by the various items displayed at the stalls, longing for his favourite toys, sweets, and flowers. He also wanted to enjoy the rides. However, after separating from his parents, the child’s attitude changed drastically. He no longer cared about the things he had previously desired; all he wanted was to be with his parents. Without them, the attractions of the fair lost their appeal, and he found no satisfaction in the things he once craved.

Q14. How did the man who found the little boy in the fair, try to soothe him?

Ans: The man who found the little boy at the fair tried various ways to soothe him. He first took him to a roundabout swing and then offered him a horse ride. He attempted to engage the boy with the snake charmer’s music and even presented him with a balloon, hoping to distract him. However, none of these efforts worked. The man also offered flowers and sweets, but the child continued to cry, longing for his parents. The boy was not interested in anything at the fair, as his heart was set on being with his mother and father.

Q15. How do you know that the lost child was a nature – lover ?

Ans: The child displayed a strong affinity for nature, reflecting his innocence and curiosity. When his mother pointed out the mustard field, he was captivated by the flowers, which appeared pale like melting gold. He noticed a group of dragonflies with their vibrant purple wings, darting around as they chased a lone black bee or butterfly seeking nectar. The child eagerly tried to catch the dragonflies, but they eluded him, fluttering away.

His fascination extended to the small insects and worms emerging from their hiding spots to bask in the sunshine. As he entered the fair, a shower of young flowers fell upon him, and he forgot about his parents, engrossed in gathering the petals. The sound of doves cooing drew him back, and he excitedly ran towards his parents, exclaiming about the doves.

Q16. What all things did the child get attracted to, once entered the fair ? Was he able to get all the things he desired ? What happened when he made a bold request to his parents ?

Ans: The child was captivated by the sight of burfi, his favourite sweet, and longed for it. However, he hesitated to ask his parents, knowing they would likely refuse, thinking he was being greedy. He then noticed a vendor selling a garland of gulmohur and felt drawn to it, but he also realised his parents would dismiss it as too cheap. Moving on, he was enchanted by the vibrant balloons but knew his parents would say he was too old for such toys.

As he wandered, he came across a snake-charmer playing a flute, but he remembered his parents forbidding him from listening to such music. Finally, he spotted a roundabout filled with laughter and excitement. Gathering his courage, he boldly asked, “I want to go on the roundabout, please, Father, Mother.” However, when he turned to look for them, he realised they were no longer behind him.

Q.1. What was the name of the beggar?
Ans. The name of the beggar was Lushkoff.

Q.2. Who did Lushkoff beg from?
Ans. He begged Sergei.

Q.3. What was Sergei’s profession?
Ans. Sergei was an advocate.

Q.4. What did Sergei remember about the beggar on seeing him?
Ans. Sergei reminded that he had seen him the previous day in Sadovya Street.

Q.5. What work did Sergei offer the beggar?
Ans. He offered the beggar the work of chopping wood.

Q.6. Who was Olga?
Ans. Olga was a maid-servant at Sergei’s home.

Q.7. What did Sergei give Lushkoff after the wood was chopped?
Ans. He gave him half a dollar.

Q.8. When did Lushkoff used to visit Sergei’s home?
Ans. Lushkoff used to visit Sergei’s home on the first of every month.

Q.9. Where did Sergei meet Lushkoff after an interval of two years?
Ans. He met him at the ticket window of a theatre.

Q.10. What did Lushkoff tell Sergei about his profession when he met him after two years?
Ans. He told him that now he was a notary and was paid thirty-five roubles a month.

Q.11. Who would chop wood for Lushkoff?
Ans. Olga would chop wood for Lushkoff.

Q.12. What changed Lushkoff’s life?
Ans. Olga’s kindness towards Lushkoff changed her life.

Q.13. How did Sergei recognise the beggar?
Ans. Sergei looked at the beggar. His face appeared familiar to him. He tried to recollect where he had seen him. Suddenly, his eyes fell on the beggar’s shoes. One shoe was high and the other was low. Now he clearly remembered where he had seen the beggar before. He had seen the beggar in the Sadovya Street

Q.14. The beggar was a liar. What two lies did he tell Sergei?
Ans. When the beggar met Sergei for the first time, he told him that he was a student and had been expelled from the college. When he met Sergei, for the second time, he told him that he had been offered a position in Kaluga, but he had no money for the fare to get there

Q.15. What kind of work was given to Lushkoff initially? Why did he agree to do it?
Ans. Sergei refused to give alms to Lushkolf, the beggar. lie offered to give him work. He took him home and gave him the work of chopping wood. Lushkoff agreed to do this work, not because he was hungry and scant work. He agreed to do it because of pride and shame and because he had been trapped by his own words.

Q.16. How did Olga treat Lushkoff in the beginning? Why did she do this?
Ans. In the beginning, Olga treated Lushkoff callously. She called him a drunkard. She rebuked him. Then she would sit before him and grow sad. She looked into his face and wept. Then she chopped wood for him. She did so because she felt pity for him. Secondly, she wanted to put him on the right path.

Q.17. Where did Sergei send Lushkoff? What advice did he give him?
Ans. Sergei wanted to give Lushkoff better, cleaner employment. His friend needed a copywriter. As Lushkoff was able to write, Sergei sent him to his friend. Sergei advised him to work hard and not to drink. He asked him not to forget his advice

Q.18. Where did Sergei see Lushkoff after two years? What work was he doing then?
Ans. One day, after two years, Sergei came across Lushkoff standing at the ticket window of a theatre, paying for a seat. He was wearing a coat collar of curly fur and a sealskin cap. Sergei recognized him. Lushkoff told him that now he was a notary and was paid thirty-five roubles a month.

Q.19.  Was Lushkoff not good at chopping wood?
Ans. No, Lushkoff was not good at chopping wood. He pulled a piece of wood towards him. Ile put it between his legs. lie hit the wood feebly with the axe. The piece of wood became unsteady and fell down. Ile again pulled it and struck it. The piece of wood again fell down. This shows that Lushkoff did not know how to chop wood.

Q.20. Write a brief character-sketch of Olga.
Ans. Olga was the maidservant of Sergei. She was stem looking. But she was kind at heart. She rebuked Lushkoff. But then she took pity on him as he was weak and hungry. She did the chopping work for Lushkoff. Olga’s kindness had a great effect on Lushkoff. He gave up drinking and started taking interest in work. Thus Olga’s kindness saved Lushkoff’s life.

Q.21. What plea does Lushkoff make to Sergei when he appears at his yard?
Ans. Lushkoff pleads to Sergei to have pity on him. He says that he has not eaten anything for three days and does not have five copecks for lodging. He further tells Sergei that he had been a village school teacher for eight years and had lost his job due to scheming and lies.

Q.22.Describe the physical appearance of Lushkoff when Sergei observes him in his yard.
Ans. Sergei observed Lushkoff closely when the latter came to his yard asking for alms. At that time, Lushkoff had a ragged appearance. He had worn a fawn-coloured overcoat and his eyes were dull and drunken. There was a red spot on either cheek. He looked every bit like a disgusting beggar.

Q.23. Why does Lushkoff want to go to Kaluga?
Ans. Lushkoff wants to go to Kaluga because he claims that he has an offer of a position in this province, after having lived without work for nearly a year. However, he cannot go there because he does not have any money.

Q.24. Has Lushkoff become a beggar by circumstance or by choice?
Ans. Lushkoff has become a beggar not by choice but by circumstance. He was a singer in a Russian choir but was sent away for his drunkenness. Alcoholism had made him weak and he could not toil, so he took to begging for survival.

Q.25. How did Sergei come to remember that he had met the beggar before?
Ans. A close look at the beggar’s face made Sergei think that he had seen the man somewhere before. Then his eyes fell on his overshoes, one of which was high and the other was low. This made Sergei remember suddenly that he had seen this beggar in Sadovya Street a couple of days before.

Q.26. Why was the beggar taken aback when Sergei asked if he remembered having met him earlier?
Ans. The beggar was taken aback because he knew that his lies were going to be caught soon. The repercussions of extracting money by exploiting the sympathy of people could be very harsh for him. He could even be handed over to the police.

Q.27. How did Sergei react when the beggar lied about his identity?
Ans. Sergei got infuriated when the beggar lied about his identity. He turned from the ragged creature with an expression of disgust and reprimanded him for dishonesty and swindling. He threatened to call the police as well.

Q.28. What lies did Lushkoff tell people to beg?
Ans. In order to beg alms and earn sympathy, Lushkoff told different lies to people. He would claim to be a student who had been expelled or a village schoolteacher who had lost his job because of the intrigues and lies of others.

Q.29. What reason does Lushkoff give to Sergei for telling lies?
Ans. Lushkoff tells Sergei that he is telling lies because no one would help him if he told the truth about his drunkenness. Instead, lies helped him get both the sympathy and money that he required desperately to keep himself alive.

Q.30. What offer was made by Sergei to the beggar in order to discourage him from begging? Why?
Ans. Sergei offered Lushkoff to chop wood for him and earn money instead of telling lies and begging. Sergei made this offer because he believed that people could be reformed by hard work and not by giving sympathy or alms.

Q.31. Is Lushkoff a willing worker? Why, then, does he agree to chop wood for Sergei?
Ans. Luskhoff is not a willing worker since alcohol has made him very weak, both physically and emotionally. Still, he agrees to do the menial job of chopping wood because of his pride and shame. Earlier he had expressed his willingness to do any work provided he was offered one and now he could not go back on his words.

Q.32. Who was Olga? What task did Sergei assign to her?
Ans. Olga was Sergei’s cook. She appeared to be ill-tempered but eventually played an instrumental role in reforming Lushkoff with her words and noble deeds. Sergei told her to take Lushkoff to the woodshed and make him chop wood for them.

Q.33. How did Lushkoff follow Olga to the woodshed? What did this reveal about his willingness to work?
Ans. Lushkoff followed Olga in a gait that showed his reluctance to work. It was obvious that his strength had been destroyed by ‘vodka’ and he was too weak to do any type of hard physical labour.

Q.34. Why did Sergei hurry into the dining room? What did he see from there?
Ans. Sergei hurried into the dining room because he wanted to check the beggar’s behaviour while chopping wood. He saw both Olga and Lushkoff walking towards the shed. He also saw Olga’s expression of wrath towards the beggar and the manner in which he struggled to chop wood in the acute cold.

Q.35. How did Olga behave with the beggar while taking him to the woodshed?
Ans. Olga behaved with Lushkoff in a very shabby manner. She looked at him angrily and even shoved him aside with her elbow while unlocking the shed. She threw an axe at his feet and scolded him all the time as he tried to chop wood.

Q.36. Who was the ‘pseudo-teacher’ and why did he sit on a log?
Ans. The ‘pseudo-teacher’ was the beggar Lushkoff. He sat on a log, lost in his thoughts as his frail health did not allow him to undertake the hard task of chopping wood but he could not get away from it either.

Q.37. Describe Lushkoff’s attempt to chop wood.
Ans. In order to chop wood, Lushkoff irresolutely pulled a billet of wood towards him, set it up between his feet, and tapped it feebly with the axe instead of hitting it hard. As a result, the billet wavered and fell down. He again pulled it to him, blew on his freezing hands, and tapped it with his axe cautiously. The billet again fell to the ground without being chopped.

Q.38. How did Sergei feel after he saw Lushkoff chopping wood?
Ans. Sergei didn’t feel angry anymore after he saw Lushkoff chopping wood. Instead, he felt a little sorry and ashamed at having given the tough task of wood-chopping to Lushkoff who seemed to him a spoiled, drunkard and probably a sick man. It was difficult for him to do such a menial task in the severe cold.

Q.39. What remuneration was paid to Lushkoff for chopping wood for the first time? What additional offer was made at this time?
Ans. Sergei paid a rouble as remuneration to the beggar for chopping wood and instructed Olga to tell him that if he wanted, he could come back and chop wood on the first day of each month.

Q.40. Why did Lushkoff return to the yard on the first of the month? Why did he reappear often?
Ans. Lushkoff returned to the yard on the first of the month in order to chop wood and earn one rouble in return. He reappeared often because every time he used to be given odd jobs like shovelling snow, putting the woodshed in order and beating the dust out of rugs and mattresses. The money he got helped him survive.

Q.41. When and why did Sergei hire Lushkoff? How did he appear at this time?
Ans. Sergei hired Lushkoff when he moved into another house. He hired him to help in packing and hauling the furniture. This time Lushkoff appeared sober but gloomy and silent.

Q.42. Why did Lushkoff become embarrassed when he came to assist Sergei in moving to another house?
Ans. Lushkoff became embarrassed when he came to assist Sergei in moving to another house because he could not help in any way. He simply walked behind the wagons hanging his head and shivering in the cold. The other carters mocked at his idleness, feebleness and his tattered fancy over-coat.

Q.43. Sergei says, “I am happy that my words have taken effect.” Why does he say so? Is he right in saying this?
Ans. Sergei says so because Lushkoff looked sober and seemed to have helped in the packing and hauling of furniture. He is partially right in saying this because his constant support had at least given Lushkoff an option to quit his disgusting life as a beggar.

Q.44. What revelation was made by Lushkoff to Sergei at the theatre?
Ans. Lushkoff revealed to Sergei that he did not chop even a single stick of wood in his yard. All the toil was done by the good and noble cook, Olga, who tried to help him and underwent misery and shed tears for his sake.

Q.45. “Thank you, too”. Why does Lushkoff say this to Sergei?
Ans. Lushkoff says this to Sergei because although Olga was the one who had actually reformed him Sergei’s contribution too was important. He had taken an interest in the life of a disgusting beggar and helped him drag himself out of the mess he was in.

Q.46. Where did Sergei send Lushkoff? What was his parting advice?
Or
Which cleaner employment did Sergei arrange for Lushkoff? How?
Ans. Sergei sent Lushkoff to his friend with a letter of recommendation for some copying work. This was a cleaner employment in comparison to wood-chopping. As a parting advice, he told Lushkoff to work hard and not to drink.

Q.47. How and why did Sergei express his pleasure before parting from Lushkoff?
Ans. Sergei expressed his pleasure by tapping Lushkoff gently on the shoulder and shaking hands with him at parting. He expressed pleasure in this manner because he was convinced that the beggar was now a reformed person and deserved respect and honour.

Q.48. How did Sergei help Lushkoff to live respectfully?
Ans. Sergei helped Lushkoff to live respectfully by giving him odd jobs every time he came to the yard. Now Lushkoff did not need to beg alms since he got money for all the little tasks that he was given by Sergei. Lastly, Sergei sent Lushkoff to his friend with a letter of recommendation for cleaner employment as a copier.

Q.49. Where did Sergei meet Lushkoff after two years? What did Lushkoff tell him about himself?
Ans. Sergei saw Lushkoff after a period of two years at the ticket window of a theatre. Lushkoff was wearing a coat collar of curly fur and a worn sealskin cap. He was buying a ticket for a gallery seat for himself. He told Sergei that he was a notary and earned thirty-five roubles a month.

Q.50. Lushkoff is earning thirty-five roubles a month. How is he obliged to Sergei for this?
Ans. Lushkoff is obliged to Sergei for earning thirty-five roubles a month because the latter had paved the way for this achievement. He had recommended Lushkoff to his friend and arranged the job of a copier for him.

Q.51. Why did Sergei call Lushkoff his ‘godson’?
Ans. Sergei called Lushkoff his ‘godson’ because he had given him a push along the right path and his efforts had lifted him out of the pit of begging. He had shown interest in Lushkoff’s life and had felt happy to see him reformed.

Q.52. Who does Lushkoff give the credit for reforming him? Why?
Or
Why does Lushkoff acknowledge Olga’s contribution in reforming him?
Ans. Lushkoff is grateful to Sergei for employment but he gives true credit for his reformation to Olga, Sergei’s cook. Outwardly Olga is full of anger and spite, but her heart is full of human sympathy and kindness. While she severely scolds Lushkoff for being a miserable drunkard, she weeps for him and chops wood for him. She is the chief reason why Lushkoff gives up his bad habits and transforms into a hardworking man.

Q.53. Has Lushkoff become a beggar by circumstance or by choice?
Ans. Lushkoff was a middle-aged man and belonged to the Russian choir. He was not a born beggar. He was sacked from the choir because of his drinking habits. He became a beggar by choice as he did not like to work hard at that stage.

Q.54. Is Lushkoff a willing worker? Why, then, does he agree to chop wood for Sergei?
Ans. No, he was not a willing worker. He was too weak to work. He had lost his strength and stamina due to his habit of drinking and, secondly, he was a middle-aged man. He agreed to chop wood because of pride and shame and he had been trapped by his own words. So he had no other way but to accept Sergei’s offer.

Q.55. Sergei says, “I am happy that my words have taken effect.” Why does he say so? Is he right in saying so?
Ans. Sergei looked satisfied with the performance of the beggar and felt happy. When Lushkoff’s job of packing and hauling the furniture was over, he praised him while handing him a rouble. But he was not right in saying so because Lushkoff had not developed the habit of working hard. He was still an idle fellow.

Q.56. Who was Lushkoff? What did he pretend to be?
Ans. Lushkoff was a middle-aged poor man. He belonged to the Russian choir but was sacked from his job due to his drinking habits. To get some money he pretended to be a school teacher who had lost his job due to conspiracy. He also pretended to be a student expelled from the school for no guilt of his.

Q.57. What did Lushkoff tell Sergei when he met him?
Ans. The beggar told Sergei when he met him that he was a hungry man. He had nothing to eat. He had been a village school teacher for eight years. He requested him to have pity on him.

Q.58. How did Olga save Lushkoff?
Ans. Olga knew that Lushkoff won’t work so she felt pity for his sad expression. She sat down opposite him and wept. She would rebuke him. Then she would chop the wood for him. At last, Lushkoff’s heart changed. He stopped drinking and became a nice man.

Q.59. How did Olga treat Lushkoff in the beginning? Why did she do this?
Ans. Olga treated Lushkoff very badly in the beginning very badly. She called him a drunkard and rebuked him for his expressions. She would look into his face and weep. Then she would chop the wood for him. She did this all to set Lushkoff on the right path.

Q.60. Why did the Carters make fun of Lushkoff?
Ans. Sergei is moved into another house. He asked Lushkoff to pack and haul the furniture. But Lushkoff hardly touched the furniture. He looked sad, silent and gloomy. He walked behind the wagons hanging his head. He also shivered in the cold. So the Carters made fun of Lushkoff for his idleness, weakness and fancy overcoat.

Q.61. Lushkoff is earning thirty-five roubles a month. How is he obliged to Sergei for this?
Ans. Sergei played a very important role in improving the condition of the beggar. It was because of Sergei that Lushkoff could earn thirty-five roubles a month. He offered him the job of chopping wood at his home. Later on, he sent him to one of his friends to do the job of copying. Lushkoff was highly obliged to Sergei as now he was a notary because of him.

Q.62. How did Sergei feel for treating Lushkoff harshly?
Ans. Sergei was an advocate. He must have followed some humane approach to reform Lushkoff. But he gave Lushkoff some kind of physically hard work that was to chop the wood for him. This task was not fit for a drunken and sick man. Besides, the weather was very cold. As it was an unjustful task for Lushkoff, Sergei felt ashamed of his act.

Q.63. How did Olga bring a change in Lushkoff?
Ans. Olga was a cook. She was a kind lady. She knew that Lushkoff was not able to do hard work. In her treatment with Lushkoff, she was harsh and tough from above and kind inside. She herself chopped wood for him, which changed his heart. As a result, Lushkoff stopped drinking and became a good man.

Q.64. What did the beggar tell Sergei? Why did Sergei threaten to call the police?
Ans. The beggar told Sergei that he had an offer of a job in the province of Kaluga. But he had no money to go there. He further said that he felt ashamed of asking. But he did so because of adverse circumstances. Sergei had seen him earlier. Then he told him that he was an expelled student. So he got angry with him and threatened to call the police.

Q.65. How did Lushkoff express his sense of gratitude to Sergei?
Ans. Lushkoff thanked Sergei greatly. He said that if he hadn’t come to him, he would still have been calling himself a teacher or a student. He said that by coming to him he had taken himself out of the pit. He expressed his sincere thanks to Olga.

Q.66. Why did Sergei call Lushkoff his ‘godson’?
Ans. When Sergei met Lushkoff for the first time, Lushkoff was wearing ragged clothes. Sergei took him to Olga who made him work. After two years, Sergei is surprised to find Lushkoff working for a notary for 35 roubles a month. This makes Sergei very happy and calls him his ‘godson’.

Q.1. How was the author’s first year in the High School?
Ans. His first year of high school was awkward.

Q.2. What did the author notice one Sunday afternoon?
Ans. lie noticed some smoke pouring in through the seams of a ceiling.

Q.3. What did the author’s mother carry out of the house first of all?
Ans. She ran out of the house carrying a small metal box full of important documents.

Q.4. What had happened to the author’s father?
Ans. His father had died when he was young.

Q.5. Why did the author’s mother run into the house for the second time?
Ans. She ran into the house for the second time to collect her husband’s letters and pictures.

Q.6. Who stopped the author to run into the house?
Ans. A firefighter stopped the author to run into the house.

Q.7. What was the author worried about after the fire tragedy?
Ans. He was most worried about his cat because it was missing.

Q.8. Where did the author and his mother spend their night after the fire tragedy?
Ans. They spent their night in the house of the author’s grandparents.

Q.9. Why did they have to borrow money?
Ans. They had to borrow money because their credit cards, cash or even identification to withdraw money from the bank had burnt in the fire.

Q.10. How did the students help the author at school?
Ans. They collected money to buy for him school supplies, notebooks, all kinds of clothes.

Q.11. Did the author get his cat back?
Ans. Yes. he got his cat back

Q.12. Why did Zan feel awkward and isolated during his first year of high school?
Ans. Zan’s position during his first year of high school as the junior most class made him feel awkward. The big size of the new school and the separation from his closest friends made him feel isolated.

Q.13.Why did the author miss his old teachers?
Ans. The author missed his old teachers because they would encourage him to get involved in school activities so that he could meet new people. They also assured him that he would soon adjust to his new school. Their affection, warmth, and cooperation in making him feel special made the author miss them.

Q.14. What kind of day it was when a fire broke out in the author’s house? What were the author and his cat doing at that time?
Ans. It was a Sunday afternoon of a cold and windy winter when the fire broke out. The author was at the dining-room table doing homework with the fire burning in the fireplace. His red tabby cat was lying over his papers, purring loudly and sometimes swatting at his pen.

Q.15. What does the author notice one Sunday afternoon? What is his mother’s reaction? What does she do?
Ans. One Sunday afternoon, the author smelled something strange and noticed smoke pouring in through the seams of the ceiling of his house. His mother reacted promptly and the two of them ran out into the front yard. However, she ran back into the house and brought out a small metal box full of important documents.

Q.16. What happened to the narrator’s mother when she had run into the burning house?
Ans. The author’s mother inhaled a little smoke when she ran into the burning house. She was rescued by the firemen who put an oxygen mask on her after bringing her out. However, she was fine soon.

Q.17. How did Zan’s mother save important documents from the burning house?
Ans. Zan’s mother saved important documents from the burning house by courageously rushing inside the house on fire and bringing out a small metal box that contained those documents. She thus risked her life but eventually succeeded in her mission.

Q.18. Why did Zan’s mother run back into the house after having saved the important documents?
Or
“I knew what she was after”. Why does Zan make this observation?
Ans. Zan’s mother ran back to save the pictures and letters of his father who had died when Zan was young. Zan knew that these memories of her husband were extremely precious for her and she did not want them to go up in flames.

Q.19. Why did Zan try to run after his mother and why did the fireman hold him back?
Ans. Zan tried to run after his mother because he was afraid of losing her. He was afraid that she might get burnt in the fire. The fireman held him back because Zan’s act was very rash and illogical. the lie could not have saved his mother and would have risked his life as well.

Q.20. Who brought out Zan’s mother from the burning house? Why was an oxygen mask put on her?
Ans. A fireman brought Zan’s mother out of the burning house. She had inhaled a little smoke and so he rushed her to the truck and put an oxygen mask on her to facilitate better breathing.

Q.21.When did the author realise that his cat was missing?
Ans. After five hours of a raging fire that burnt down the author’s house almost completely, he realised that his cat was missing. He had not seen her all this while and realised to his horror that she was nowhere to be found.

Q.22. Why does the narrator say, “I was suffering loss, big time”?
Ans. The author feels that he was suffering loss, big time because he had lost his old dear school and teachers, he had lost his house to the fire, and now he had lost his dear cat whom he loved dearly.

Q.23. Why does Zan break down in tears after the fire?
Ans. Zan breaks down in tears after the fire because he had lately been suffering losses. His old school, his house and his cat – all had been lost. The tears were an emotional outburst of a teenager who was struggling with adjustment issues.

Q.24. In what condition does the author go to school after the fire incident?
Ans. After the fire incident, the author goes to school wearing the dress that he had worn to church on Sunday morning and the tennis shoes that he had borrowed from his aunt. His shoes, clothes, books, homework, and backpack had been destroyed in the fire.

Q.25.  Why is the author deeply embarrassed the next day in school? Which words show his fear and insecurity?
Ans. The author is embarrassed because he feels that his appearance is weird without uniform, books and a backpack. His fear and insecurity are shown by the words: “Was I destined to be an outcast and geek all my life?”.

Q.26. Why did the author dislike growing up?
Ans. The author disliked growing up because he felt that growing up had brought so many losses with it. He had lost his old school, his friends, his house and most of all his dear pet cat.

Q.27. What is surreal? Why does the author feel that everything was surreal?
Ans. Surreal means something strange or unreal. The author felt that everything was surreal because too many unfortunate things had happened to him – his house was burnt down, his cat was lost, his mother was left with no money and he had no books, shoes, clothes and school uniform. His secure zone had been ripped away suddenly and the changes were too much and too many for him to handle.

Q.28. What was the extent of the damage caused by the fire?
Ans. All belongings except photo albums, documents and some personal items had got burnt in the fire. Whatever remained had got destroyed by the water and chemicals that had been used to put out the fire.

Q.29. The author’s heart ached for his cat but there was no time to grieve. Why? The author felt pain at the loss of his cat but life had to move on.
Ans. He could not grieve as a new place to live had to be found and new clothes had to be bought for school.

Q.30.Why did Zan’s mother have to borrow money from his grandparents?
Ans. Zan’s mother had to borrow money from his grandparents because her credit cards, cash and even identification that was needed to draw money from the bank had got burnt up in the fire. She had to rent a new place, buy new clothes for Zan and resettle quickly. She did not have time to wait for the recovery of her lost documents till then.

Q.31. Why did the narrator go over to his burnt house even though they had rented an apartment nearby?
Ans. The narrator went over to his burnt house even though they had rented an apartment nearby because he hoped that his cat would be found somewhere. He would watch the clearing away of the debris expecting to see his cat.

Q.32. What thoughts crossed Zan’s mind when he missed his cat?
Ans. Zan thought of his cat as the vulnerable little kitten who would tag along after him in the morning. He thought of how she would climb up his robe and crawl into his pocket to fall sleep.

Q.33. How and why were people acting stranger than usual at Zan’s school?
Ans. When Zan was getting ready for gym class at his locker, people were gathering around him asking him to hurry up. This was stranger than usual as they almost seemed to shove him into the gym. They behaved so because they had put up a surprise collection of school supplies and clothes etc for Zan in the gym.

Q.34. What help did the author get from his schoolmates after the fire accident?
Or
What kind of gesture did Zan’s schoolmates show to hint?
Ans. The author’s schoolmates helped him by getting him school supplies, notebooks, and different clothes – jeans, tops sweatshirts. Those who had never spoken to him introduced themselves and many invited him to their homes.

Q.35. Why was the author overcome by emotions when he got help from his schoolmates?
Ans. The author was overcome by emotions when he got help from his schoolmates because they had gone out of their way to bring him the things he needed. He was touched by their genuine outpouring of concern.

Q.36. When does the author say “It was like Christmas”? Why?
Ans. The author says this when he gets inside the gym to see the surprise load of school supplies and different clothes on the big table only for him. This seemed like Christmas because these assorted gifts were similar to the surprise gifts that one gets from loved ones on Christmas.

Q.37. What made the author finally breathe a sigh of relief?
Ans. The thought for the first time that things were going to be okay made the author finally breathe a sigh of relief. He had made friends in the new school who had a genuine concern for him.

Q.38. Why was it different for Zan to see his house getting rebuilt? How did the fire help him?
Ans. It was different to see his house getting rebuilt because Zan wasn’t alone this time. Two of his new friends from school were with him. The fire had helped him by diverting his mind away from his feelings of insecurity. He now opened up to the wonderful people around.

Q.39. Where was the cat after the fire? Who brings it back and how?
Or
How did Zan get back his beloved cat?
Ans. The cat had been so freaked by the fire that she had run away over a mile away. A woman brings her back by locating the owners through different sources because the phone number etched on the cat’s collar could not be reached as it had been disconnected due to the fire.

Q.40. How did the author’s feelings of loss and tragedy seem to diminish?
Ans.  The author felt gratitude for life, his new friends, the kindness of the woman who had rescued his cat and certainly for the life of his beautiful cat. This gratitude diminished his feelings of loss and tragedy.

Q.41. What problem does the author face when he moves to a new school?
Ans. In the junior school,l he was the head boy of his class. He was very close to all the teachers. He enjoyed the seniority. But when he joins a new school at senior level, he faces many problems. This school was twice as big as his old school. He felt very isolated.

Q.42. Even after taking admission in a new school, why did the author keep visit his teachers at the old school
Ans. The author felt very isolated in the new school. It was a big school and nobody knew him there. All his fellow at the junior school had taken admission in other schools. But he was very close to the teachers of the previous school. So he visited them often.

Q.43. What was the effect of the smoke on the author’s mother?
Ans. Their house got a big fire. In a crazed state, she ran inside the house to get the pictures of her dead husband. The second time also she rushed inside. But this time she inhaled smoke. A fireman rescued her from inside the house.

Q.44. What does the author notice one Sunday afternoon? What is his mother’s reaction? What does she do?
Ans. The author, while doing his homework, noticed the smoke pouring in through the seams of the ceiling. The room was filled with the smoke very quickly. The author and his mother ran outside to save their life. His mother ran out of the house with a small metal box full of important documents. She became so crazy that she rushed back to the house just after dropping the box.

Q.45. Why is the author deeply embarrassed the next day in school? Which words show his fear and insecurity?
Ans. The author was full of remorse as he was left with nothing. He didn’t have a proper dress and study material. He had no backpack. He had a feeling of insecurity. All things appeared strange to him. He was shocked deeply and seemed frustrated. The words uttered by him “Was I destined to be an outcast and a geek all my life? I didn’t want to grow up, change or have to handle life, if it was to going to be this way. I just wanted to curl up and die”. These words reveal his fear and insecurity.

Q.46. What was the author’s mother doing on a Sunday afternoon?
Ans. It was blowing cold on that Sunday afternoon. And the author was doing homework at the dining table. His mother was fuelling the fire at the fireplace to keep the room warm.

Q.47. How did Zan’s mother save important documents from the burning house?
Ans. When the house caught fire, the narrator and his mother were in the house. Zan’s mother ran out of the house carrying a small metal box full of important documents. She again ran back to bring back her husband’s pictures and letters.

Q.48. Why did the firemen hold the author?
Ans. The author loved his mother too much. He saw his mother running into the burning house. He got emotionally charged out and trying to follow her. The fireman stopped him forcefully, otherwise, he would have jumped into the fire he could have lost his life.

Q.49. Which three things made the author’s house a home?
Ans. The fire tragedy changed the author’s life. He was so depressed that he did not want to grow up and wanted to die. But his reunion with his cat, his new friends in the school and his new house made his house ‘a home’ where he could live.

Q.50. What actions of the schoolmates change the author’s understanding of life and people, and comfort him emotionally? How does his loneliness vanish and how does he start participating in life?
Ans. His schoolmates bought him school supplies, notebooks, all kinds of different clothes for the author in order to help him. It was a matter of surprise and too difficult to believe for him. He got emotional satisfaction. People who had never spoken, introduced themselves one by one. All things seemed new and got back his interest in life. Now, he had all the things whatever he used to have. He started enjoying his life as usual.

Q.51. What happened to the author’s cat after his house was burned down?
Ans. When the fire broke, almost the entire house was burnt. The author realised that the cat was nowhere to be found. It was clear that the cat might have been injured due to fire or run away due to fear.

Q.52. How did Zan go to the school the next day after a fire burned down his house?
Ans. Next day, the author went to school in an embarrassing situation. He was not in school uniform. He looked weird in his clothes. He had neither books nor bag. He felt as if he was an outcast and wanted to die.

Q.53. Why did the author, Zan, love his cat so much?
Ans. He had a pet cat which was his constant companion and source of entertainment. He was fond of her and could never think of living away from her. He had a special bond with her because he had rescued her when she was a small kitten.

Q.54. How did the narrator realise that he was not alone in the world?
Ans. Unfortunately, a fierce fire had burnt down the narrator’s house. He had lost everything in the fire and become deserted. But he went to school the following day and found that his friends were also worried about this incident. They gave him many things. Thus, the feeling of his insecurity gradually vanished and he realised that he had many friends to decrease his problems. He became open up to all the wonderful people around him.

Q.55. What happened to the narrator’s cat?
Ans. The narrator loved his cat very much. Unfortunately, a fierce fire broke into his house and burnt down everything. His cat was found nowhere in the house. Anything might have happened to the cat. It might have been either injured in the fire or run away to save its life.

Q.56. When the narrator’s house was on fire, how did his mother try to save the threads of life?
Ans. When the fierce fire broke out in the narrator’s house, his mother ran to the house repeatedly. She had to save the threads of life. She ran to the house to collect important documents. She also tried to save the pictures of her husband and letters because they were the precious gifts of time for her.

Q.57. How did the author get rid of his feelings of loss and tragedy?
Ans. His new friends in the new school and the kindness of the lady, who returned his cat, helped the author in getting rid of his feelings of loss and tragedy. He regained confidence. Now he wanted to live happily in his new home.

Q.1. Who were Sue and Johnsy?
Ans. Sue and Johnsy were two artists.

Q.2. What happened to Johnsy?
Ans. Johnsy fell very seriously ill in November.

Q.3. What fear did Johnsy have in her mind?
Ans. She feared that she would die on the day when the last leaf on the creeper fell.

Q.4. Why was the doctor confused about Johnsy’s illness?
Ans. The doctor was confused because no medicine was proving effective on Johnsy.

Q.5. What was happening to the leaves on the creeper outside Johnsy’s window?
Ans. The leaves were falling because of the extreme cold and strong wind.

Q.6. Who was Behrman?
Ans. Behrman was an old painter.

Q.7. What did Behrman do?
Ans. Ile painted a picture of creeper with a leaf on the wail.

Q.8. What happened to Behrman?
Ans. Behrman died of pneumonia.

Q.9. What was Behrntan’s dream?
Ans. Behrman’s dream was to paint a masterpiece.

Q.10. What was Behrman’s masterpiece?
Ans. The painting of a creeper with a leaf on it was Behnnan’s masterpiece.

Q.11. Was Johnsy’s life saved?
Ans. Yes, Johnsy’s life was saved.

Q.12. Who saved Johnsy’s life?
Ans. The old painter Behrman save Johnsy’s life.

Q.13.Who were Sue and Johnsy? Where did they live?
Ans. Sue and Johnsy were young artist friends who were struggling to establish themselves in the world of art. Both lived in a small flat which was on the third floor of an old house. They shared this place.

Q.14. Why did Sue become worried when Johnsy fell ill?
Ans. Sue became worried because Johnsy would lie in her bed without moving, just gazing out of the window. Johnsy had pneumonia and it seemed curable but her condition indicated otherwise.

Q.15. Why was Johnsy’s condition worrisome according to the doctor?
Ans. According to the doctor, Johnsy’s condition was worrisome because she did not show any signs of improvement despite good treatment. He thought that perhaps she had lost her will to live and no medicine could help her in this negative state of mind.

Q.16. How did Johnsy associate herself with the falling leaves?
Ans. It was autumn and the ivy creeper leaves were falling gradually. This depressed an already ill Johnsy and strangely enough she associated her falling health with the leaves. She believed that she would die when the last leaf fell.

Q.17. How did Sue try to revive Johnsy’s interest in things around her?
Ans. Sue talked about clothes and fashions to draw Johnsy’s interest in things around her. She also moved her drawing-board to Johnsy’s room and whistled as she painted, to keep Johnsy’s mind off her illness.

Q.18.How did Sue help Johnsy during her illness?
Ans. Sue helped Johnsy by looking after all her needs. She would give her hot soup from time to time and sit by her side and talk to her. She called the doctor and even sought help from their neighbour Behrman.

Q.19. Why was Johnsy counting backwards while looking out of the window?
Ans. Johnsy kept looking out of the window and counted backwards to note the number of leaves left on the ivy-creeper. She believed that she would die when the last leaf fell whereas the leaves were falling in a normal process of nature during the autumn season.

Q.20.What did Sue see when she heard Johnsy counting backwards?
Ans. When Sue heard Johnsy counting backwards, she looked out of the window and saw an old ivy creeper climbing half way up the brick wall opposite their window. The creeper was shedding leaves due to the strong autumn wind.

Q.21. How did Sue try to convince Johnsy that her belief about dying with the last leaf was nonsense?
Ans. Sue immediately rubbished Johnsy’s belief as nonsense. She tried to convince her by telling that old ivy leaves had nothing to do with her illness. The doctor too was confident that she would get better.

Q.22. Why did Sue seek the promise from Johnsy not to look out of the window while she completed her painting?
Ans. Sue sought this promise because she did not want Johnsy to go deeper into the depression on seeing the ivy leaves fall. Moreover, she could not even pull the curtains to stop Johnsy from looking out as she needed the incoming light to complete her painting and get money for the two of them by selling it.

Q.23.Who was Behrman? Why did Sue share her worry with him?
Ans. Behrman was a sixty-year-old painter who lived on the ground floor of the same building as Sue and Johnsy. Sue shared her worry with him because Behrman was an elderly person and his vast experience of life could be of great help.

Q.24. Behrman has a dream. What is it? Does it come true?
Or
What was Behrman’s dream? How did it come true?
Ans. Behrman dreamt of painting a masterpiece some day. His dream did come true when he painted a leaf that was a near replica of a real leaf. This masterpiece saved a young life and fulfilled Behrman’s ambition too. Unfortunately, it cost him his life.

Q.25. ‘I’m tired of waiting.’ Why did Johnsy say so to Sue?
Ans.  Johnsy wanted Sue to finish her painting quickly so that she could see the last leaf fall. She believed that she would die with it but this was taking too long. She became tired of waiting for the last leaf to fall.

Q.26. What did Sue and Behrman see from the window of the room next to Johnsy’s?
Ans. Sue and Behrman saw that only one leaf was left on the ivy creeper that was fluttering in the icy-cold wind accompanied by heavy rain. Under such conditions, it was bound to fall anytime soon.

Q.27.Why was Sue nervous and reluctant while drawing the curtains on the morning after the storm?
Ans. Sue was nervous because she was certain that the last leaf had fallen at night. This could make Johnsy quit all hope of survival as she had associated her death with the falling leaves of the ivy creeper.

Q.28. What made Sue exclaim on looking out of the window on the morning after the storm?
Or
What did Sue point out to Johnsy when she looked out of the window in the morning after the storm?
Ans. Sue exclaimed in amazement and delight because the last leaf was still there on the ivy creeper. She pointed out to Johnsy that the leaf looked quite green and healthy. It had not fallen in spite of the fierce winds and rain. This meant that Johnsy too could recover.

Q.29. How did Sue try to encourage Johnsy?
Ans. Sue tried to encourage Johnsy by telling her that she won’t die and that she had to live for the sake of her friends. She further pleaded with Johnsy to spare a thought for her as she could not live without Johnsy.

Q.30. What did Johnsy admit to Sue when the last leaf did not fall?
Or
When did Johnsy realise her mistake?
Ans. When Johnsy saw the last leaf intact, she admitted that Sue had looked after her so lovingly and she, in turn, had been a bad, wicked, gloomy, and non-cooperative girl. She had now realised that it was a sin to want to die.

Q.31. When and why was the doctor’s report encouraging about Johnsy’s condition?
Ans. The doctor gave an encouraging report about Johnsy’s condition after examining her in the afternoon a day after the storm. He believed that the report was encouraging because now Johnsy had regained her will to live.

Q.32. What news about Behrman did the doctor convey to Sue when he came to examine Johnsy?
Ans. When the doctor came to examine Johnsy, he told Sue that Behrman too was suffering from pneumonia. He said that he was confident of Johnsy’s recovery but feared that there was no hope for Behrman.

Q.33. What led to Behrman’s unfortunate death?
Or
Why did Behrman spend a night out in the storm and rain?
Ans. Behrman died because he had spent the entire stormy night painting a replica of the last leaf on the ivy creeper and had caught pneumonia as a result. He did this to save Johnsy’s life. He did not want her to see the creeper without its last leaf and lose the will to live

Q.34. Which items were found near Behrman when he died? What did this signify?
Ans. A ladder and a lighted lantern were found near Behrman’s bed when he died. There were also some brushes and green and yellow AT paints on the floor near the ladder. This signified that the last green and fresh leaf had been painted by Behrman all through the stormy night.

Q.35. What is Behrman’s masterpiece? What makes Sue say so?
Ans. Behrman’s masterpiece was the leaf that he painted on the wall opposite Johnsy’s window. He had braved icy winds and rains at night while painting the leaf. Sue called it a masterpiece as it was gmen and healthy like a real leaf. Besides, it had saved Johnsy’s; life by reviving her will to live. Thus, Behrman’s painting was a masterpiece in the sense that it had saved a precious life and was able to fox an artist.

Q.36.What saved Johnsy’s life? The last half painted by Behrman on the wall opposite Johnsy’s
Ans. window saved her life. The leaf was a true replica of the last leaf hanging on the ivy creeper. Johnsy mistook it to be a real leaf and felt that she had been wicked and it was a sin to want to die.

Q.37.‘It looks quite green and healthy’. What were the cause of the leaf’s colour and freshness?
Ans. The last leaf on the ivy creeper looked quite green and healthy because it was not a real leaf, but a painted one. Behrman had painted it overnight to help save Johnsy’s life.

Q.38. Why did Johnsy keep looking out of the window?
Ans. There was a creeper on the wall facing Johnsy’s window. She had a fancy that she would die when the last leaf of the creeper fell. The leaves were falling because it was an autumn season. So Johnsy kept looking out of the window.

Q.39. How did Sue try to keep Johnsy cheerful?
Ans. The doctor had said that Johnsy’s chances of recovery were only one out of ten. Sue became sad and cried bitterly. But she wanted to cheer up Johnsy. So she entered her room, whistling a cheerful tune.

Q.40. How did Behrman react to Johnsy’s fancy?
Ans. Johnsy had a fancy that she would die when the last leaf fell. Brennan did not like this fancy of Johnsy. He called her fancy mere nonsense. He said that she should not have such absurd ideas.

Q.41. What did Johnsy believe about the falling leaves? Did Sue believe the same?
Ans. Johnsy got a fancy that she would die with the fall of the last leaf. But, Sue considered it a foolish idea. She said that there’could be no relationship between the last leaf and somebody’s life.

Q.42. How did old Behrman die?
Ans. Behrman knew about Johnsy’s fancy about the falling leaves. He went out in the cold and snow and painted a leaf on the wall. l le caught pneumonia and died.

Q.43. How did Johnsy realise her mistake?
Ans. Johnsy was suffering from pneumonia. There was a creeper on the wall facing her window. Johnsy had a fancy that she would die when the last leaf fell. One night, there was only one leaf left. She thought that she would also die with the falling of the leaf. But that night, Behanan painted a leaf in its place. So it did not fall. It made her realise that it was a sin to wish to die.

Q.44. What kind of a friend was Sue to Johnsy?
Ans. Sue and Johnsy were close friends. Both were painters. Apart from that their tastes and views were similar. They lived in the same small flat. When Johnsy suffered from pneumonia, Sue looked after her with love and care. It was largely because of her care that Johnsy’s life was saved.

Q.45. Describe in your own words the colony where the artists lived.
Ans. The artists’ colony grew in the old village named Greenwich. It was to the west of Washington Square., Its streets were winding. These streets had strange angles and curves.

Q.46. What is Johnsy’s illness? What can cure her, the medicine or the willingness to live?
Ans. Johnsy, a young artist, was ill. She was suffering from pneumonia. But later on, she suffered from a misconception that she would the as soon as the last leaf on the creeper would fall down. The medicine had no effect on her. Her willingness to live could only cure her.

Q.47. Do you think the feeling of depression Johnsy has is common among teenagers?
Ans. Life has two aspects i.e. positive and negative. It depends upon us how we take it. Nowadays, it is very common that teenagers are getting depressed because of cut-throat competition. On the other hand, a majority of teenagers who take life positively and face difficulties boldly never lose hope and proceed further.

Q.48. What is Behrman’s masterpiece? What makes Sue say so?
Ans. Behrman was a 60-year old artist who had a dream to paint a masterpiece. His painting of an ivy leaf was his masterpiece which saved the life of Johnsy. It was such a painting and it was not easy to make out whether the leaf was real or a painted leaf. When Behrman died because of creating this life-saving painting in the cold weather, Sue called it a masterpiece.

Q.49. Who were Sue and Johnsy and how were they living?
Ans. Sue and Johnsy were two young artists. Their economic condition was not good. They were strugglers. They lived in the artist’s colony. They shared a small flat.

Q.50. How did Behrman react to Johnsy’s fancy?
Ans. When Behrman came to know about Johnsy’s belief regarding the fall of leaves, he saw the creeper and realised that the last leaf was sure to fall. He said nothing. He decided to do something to save her life.

Q.51. What saved Johnsy’s life?
Ans. Johnsy had lost charm in life due to pneumonia. She thought that when the last leaf fell, she would die. Behrman finally painted the masterpiece. The leaf painted by him saved Johnsy’s life. As the last (painted) leaf did not fall, Johnsy got back her will to live.

Q.52. Behrman has a dream. What is it? Does it come true?
Ans. Behrman was a sixty years old painter. He lived on the ground floor of the building. His only dream in life was to paint a masterpiece. His dream was fulfilled when he painted the last leaf of the ivy creeper.

Q.53. What made the doctor come to the flat of Sue and Johnsy?
Ans. Johnsy was severely ill. She was attacked by pneumonia. Her weak body was helpless to bear the severity of the attack. She lay miserable in her bed. But her condition was deteriorating day by day. As her condition had alarmed Sue, he requested the doctor to come and examine her friend Johnsy.

Q.54. How did Sue respond to the doctor’s advice?
Ans. The doctor declared that there were fewer chances for her friend’s survival. It was a grim warning for her. She thought that she must do something so that her friend Johnsy could get back her will to live and may recover soon. She was a pragmatic and tenacious person. Besides, she was determined to take her friend out of despair. Therefore, she began to think about the ways positively.

Q.55. Why did Behrman die?
Ans. Behrman was an old artist of sixty years. He worked whole night in the stormy and rainy weather to paint the leaf on the wall. He was completely drenched. His clothes and shoes were wet and he was completely shivering. He fell to pneumonia and died. But before his death, he was successful in fulfilling his dream of making a masterpiece.

Q.56. Why did Johnsy link her death with the last leaf?
Ans. Johnsy was emotionally disturbed. She developed a belief that she would die with the fall of the last leaf on the creeper. She started counting the leaves. In fact, she had an attack of depression too.

Q.57. How did Sue pour out her worries to Behrman? What was his reaction?
Ans. Behrman was a sixty-year-old painter living on the ground floor. Sue poured out her worries about Johnsy to the old painter. She told that Johnsy was convinced that she would die when the last leaf fell. Behrman called Johnsy ‘stupid and foolish’ as her mind was obsessed with superstition. He didn’t say a word and went back to his room. He didn’t even tell Sue how he was going to help Johnsy and in what way.

Q.58. What revived Johnsy’s will to live?
Ans. Johnsy had developed a superstition that she would die with the fall of the last leaf. Actually, a severe attack of pneumonia had left her mind morbid. When she saw the last leaf surviving after the windy wet night, her will to live revived. It made her realise that it was really a sin to want to die.

Q.59. What quality of friendship do you find in Sue as a friend?
Ans. Sue was a loving and earing friend of Johnsy. She was the best friend of her as Sue always provided her mental support. When her friend was obsessed with the thought dying with the fall of the last leaf on the ivy creeper, she tried to look at the positive side of things. She always convinced her friend to think positively and never think about death. Obviously, she represents true friendships and sacrifice in the story.

Q.60. How was Johnsy life saved?
Ans. Behrman was an Old artist. His last desire was to paint a masterpiece in his life. The masterpiece painted by him saved Johnsy’s life. The leaf painted by him survived through the storm of night. But he was attacked by pneumonia and fell seriously ill. Johnsy got the willpower to live because the last leaf did not fall off the ivy creeper. Thus, Behrman’s masterpiece saved Johnsy’s life.

Q.1. When did the cyclone hit Orissa?
Ans. The cyclone hit Orissa on 27 October 1999.

Q.2. Where was Prashant when the cyclone hit Orissa?
Ans. At that time he was in a small coastal town of Orissa, some eighteen kilometers from his village.

Q.3. What was the name of Prashant’s village?
Ans. The name of his village was Kalikuda.

Q.4. Who met Prashant on his way back to the village?
Ans. He met two friends of his uncle on his way back to the village.

Q.5. What had Prashant to push away on his way back to the village?
Ans. Prashant had to push away many human bodies, and carcasses of dogs, cattle and goats.

Q.6. How did Prashant find his house when he reached his village?
Ans. He found only the remnants of the roof of his house.

Q.7. What did Prashant found about children in the relief camp?
Ans. Prashant found that a large number of children had been orphaned.

Q.8. How have the people of the community helped one another?
Ans. The people of the community helped one another with great co-operation.

Q.9. How did Prashant feel when he reached his village?
Ans. His heart went cold when he reached his village.

Q.10. How did Prashant travel back to his village from Ersama?
Ans. Prashant travelled on foot and swim through the deep water back to his village.

Q.11. How did people receive food in Prashant’s village?
Ans. Food packets were dropped by helicopters.

Q.12. Where were Prashant and his friends during the two days of the super cyclone? What did they live on? Where did they get their ‘food’ from?
Ans. 

• The rainwater was entering the house during the super cyclone. So, Prashant and his friend’s family remained on the roof of the house for two days.
• Two coconut trees had fallen on the roof of the house. Prashant and his friend’s family lived on them. They got their food from these tender coconuts.

Q.13. (i) Why was it difficult for Prashant to travel back to his village?
Ans. There was water everywhere. He had to use his stick to locate the road. At some places, it was waist-deep and the progress was slow. Sometimes, he lost the road and had to swim. After some distance, he found two friends of his uncle. They decided to move ahead together. They had to push away many human bodies floating on the water.
(ii) “His heart went cold’ when he reached his village. Why?
Ans. At last, Prashant reached his village Kalikuda. His heart sank. His house was gone. His family was nowhere. In order to look for his family, Prashant went to the Red Cross Shelter. Fortunately, his family was alive. They were very glad to see Prashant. He came to know that eighty-six lives were lost in his village and all the ninety-six houses had been washed away.

Q.14.What were the two important tasks Prashant did after deciding to be the leader of the village?
Ans. 

• The first task was that he organized a group of youths and elders to make the merchant give them rice. They succeeded in their mission. 
• Secondly, he made a team of youth volunteers. They cleaned the shelter of the dirt, urine, vomit, and floating carcasses.

Q.15. How did the villagers make the helicopters drop regular quantities of the flood?
Ans. Prashant and others devised a plan to attract the attention of the helicopters. They deputed children to lie there with empty utensils on their stomachs. This was done to communicate to the helicopters that they were hungry. The scheme worked and the helicopters started dropping food regularly.

Q.16. How did Prashant and his friend’s family pass two days of the super cyclone?
Ans. As the floodwater was rising, Prashant and his friend’s family sat on the open roof of the house. They froze in the cold and continuous rain. Two coconut trees had fallen on the roof. They proved to be a blessing in disguise. They survived by eating tender coconuts.

Q.17. What havoc had the super cyclone wrecked in the life of the people of Orissa?
Ans. 

• The super cyclone was a devastating storm that washed houses away and destroyed hundreds of villages. It killed thousands of people and uprooted a large number of trees. 
• There were dead bodies all around. People became homeless and many children who had lost their parents became orphans. This crazed destruction continued for the next thirty-six hours. The condition seemed grim after the super cyclone.

Q.18. How has Prashant, a teenager, been able to help the people of his village?
Ans. On reaching his village, Prashant found deplorable conditions all around him. He had leadership qualities so he took the initiative to rehabilitate people. He made a team of young volunteers and cleaned urine, filth, vomit, and floating carcasses. His team was fully dedicated to serving others. He persuaded grief-stricken women to look after children. In this way, he became a ray of hope for all.

Q.19. How did Prashant spend his time during the first two days of the super cyclone?
Ans. When the super cyclone hit coastal Orissa, Prashant was at his friend’s house with neck-deep water. They spent two days on the roof of the house and lived on tender coconuts of those two trees which had fallen on the roof.

Q.20. What did Prashant see when he reached his village?
Ans. When Prashant reached his village, his heart turned cold. Houses had been washed away. Only roofs were lying on the ground. The belongings were mixed up and twisted. The tree branches appeared above water. His maternal grandmother was the first woman Prashant saw in the crowd at the Red Cross shelter.

Q.21. How did Prashant manage food for village people?
Ans. A military helicopter dropped some parcels but they didn’t return. The youth task force of the village asked the children to lie in the sand with empty utensils on their stomachs. They were successful in telling the helicopters that they were hungry. So the helicopter dropped regular food and other supplies to them.

Q.22. How did the super cyclone affect the life of the people of Orissa?
Ans. Super cyclone in Orissa in October 1999 proved very devastating. Heavy and incessant rain filled the darkness. Ancient trees were uprooted and crashed to the earth. People and houses were washed away.

Q.23. What did Prashant do for orphaned children?
Ans. Prashant found that a large number of children had been orphaned. He brought them together and put up a polythene shelter for them. He organised cricket matches for children. Prashant tried to set up their children in new foster families made up of childless widows and children.

Q.24. Do you think Prashant is a good leader? Do you think young people can get together to help people during natural calamities?
Ans. Undoubtedly, Prashant is a good leader. He has all the qualities of a leader. 

• He has a special quality of taking initiatives. 
• His vision is quite clear. 
• He faces adverse circumstances courageously. 
• He is a source of energy for others and has great motivational power. 

I think that youth is power. This power can be used to assist society during natural disasters. Whatever job is assigned to the youth in such circumstances they perform their duty with full spirit.

Q.25. How have the people of the community helped one another? What role do the women of Kalikuda play during these days?
Ans. Prashant took the initiative and mobilized everyone to help one another. In this time of distress, the people of the community joined hands together and started relief work. Women started working in the Food for Work Programme and looked after the orphans.

Q.26. What happened in the evening when Prashant was at his friend’s house in Ersama?
Ans. In the evening when Prashant was at his friend’s house, a dark and menacing storm gathered. Winds started blowing at great speed. Heavy and continuous rains filled the darkness. Ancient trees were uprooted and crushed to death. The angry water rushed in his friend’s house, neck deep.

Q.27. Where had Prashant gone on 27th October 1999? Why?
Ans. Prashant had gone to block headquarters of Ersama on 27th October 1999. He had gone there to spend a day with a friend. Ersama is a small town in coastal Orissa.

Q.28. How did the two fallen coconut trees prove a blessing in disguise for Prashant and his friend’s family?
Ans. The cyclonic storm with a high wind velocity of 350 km per hour uprooted many huge and old trees. Two coconut trees had fallen on the roof of their house. This proved to be a blessing in disguise for them. The tender coconuts from the trees kept the trapped family from starving for several days.

Q.29. How were the orphans and the widows resettled?
Ans. Prashant had deep sympathy for the flood victims. He could not tolerate the deplorable condition of women and children. He decided to get them engaged. So, he persuaded the women to work in the food-for-work programme. He made a special arrangement for the children to keep them busy.

Q.30. After becoming the leader of his village, Prashant performed two important tasks. What were they?
Ans. Prashant was a courageous boy. He decided to improve the condition of the village. He became the leader of the village and started work. 

• First of all, he organised the youths and elders of the village into a group. They put pressure on the rich merchant to donate some rice for the poor. 
• They also made the helicopters drop food for the hungry people.

Q.31. Why do Prashant and other volunteers resist the plan to set up institutions for orphans and widows? What alternatives do they consider?
Ans. 

• Prashant and other volunteers resisted the plan as they felt that it would not be proper to set up separate institutions for orphans and widows. 
• The group of volunteers was of the opinion that in these institutions children would not be able to get love and widows would suffer from stigma and loneliness and isolation. 
• The group decided to rehabilitate them in their own community. New families were made and the childless widows took care of the orphans.

Q1. Describe the statue of the Happy Prince.
Ans: The statue of the Happy Prince stood tall on a high column, entirely covered in thin layers of gold. His eyes were made of bright sapphires, and a large red ruby adorned the hilt of his sword.

Q2. What made the statue of the Happy Prince cry?
Ans: The statue of the Happy Prince cried because it could see the misery and suffering of the people below. From its high position, it witnessed a seamstress who had nothing to offer her sick son except river water. This sight deeply moved the Happy Prince, prompting its tears.

Q3. Why was the statue called the Happy Prince?
Ans: The statue was named the Happy Prince because it symbolised a prince who lived a life free from sorrow and tears. He resided in a palace and died feeling content, which is why he earned this joyful title.

Q4. Why did the Happy Prince request the swallow to stay with him for the night?
Ans: The Happy Prince asked the swallow to stay with him for the night because he wanted to send the ruby from his sword hilt to a seamstress in need. This seamstress had a sick son, and since the Prince was a statue, he could not deliver the ruby himself. The swallow could assist by carrying it to her, thus providing much-needed help.

Q5. How did the swallow give comfort to the son of the seamstress?
Ans: The swallow provided comfort to the son of the seamstress by gently fanning him with its wings. This soothing action helped to cool his fever and allowed him to fall asleep peacefully. The swallow acted out of kindness and compassion, deeply moved by the struggles faced by the boy and his mother.

Q6. What was the last wish of the swallow?
Ans: The swallow understood that her time was up. She flew to the shoulder of the Happy Prince and said, “I wish to kiss your hand.” The Happy Prince replied, “Kiss me on the lips, for I love you.” The swallow then kissed him on the lips and fell dead at his feet.

Q7. Describe the statue of the Happy Prince as depicted at the beginning of the story.
Ans: The statue of the Happy Prince stood high on a tall column, overlooking the city. It was covered in thin leaves of fine gold, which gave it a shimmering appearance. The statue’s eyes were made of two bright sapphires, and a large red ruby adorned the hilt of its sword.

Q8. Where was the swallow going? Why did he decide not to go there?
Ans: The swallow was heading to Egypt to reunite with his friends, who had arrived there six weeks earlier. Initially, he had planned to stop for just one night to rest during his long journey. However, he became so attached to the Happy Prince that he couldn’t bear to see him in distress. As a result, he chose to stay and act as his messenger.

Q9. Why did the swallow stop in the city? Where did he put up for the night?
Ans: The swallow stopped in the city to rest during his long journey to Egypt, as his friends had already arrived there. He chose to spend the night between the feet of the Happy Prince, finding a suitable spot for his stay.

Q10. What happened when the little swallow was getting ready to sleep?
Ans: As the little swallow was preparing to sleep, a large drop of water fell on him. He found this curious because the night was clear, bright, and filled with stars, showing no signs of rain. This unexpected occurrence made him wonder about the statue he was resting on, questioning its purpose if it couldn’t keep the rain off.

Q11. What were the drops of rain actually? Why did they fall?
Ans: The drops of rain were actually the tears from the Happy Prince’s sapphire eyes. He shed these tears because he felt sad witnessing the poverty and misery of the city’s inhabitants.

Q12. What made the statue of the Happy Prince cry?
Ans: The Happy Prince had never experienced sorrow during his life. However, after his death, he was placed on a high pedestal, which allowed him to see the ugliness and misery of his city. This sight filled him with deep sorrow, causing him to weep.

Q13. When did the Prince first ask the swallow to stay on? Why?
Ans: The Prince first asked the swallow to stay for the night after he saw a poor seamstress and her sick son. Since the Prince’s feet were fastened to the pedestal, he could not move. He needed the swallow’s help to bring relief and joy to the seamstress and her hungry child.

Q14. Why did the swallow refuse to carry ruby to the seamstress? Why did he finally agree to do it?
Ans: The swallow initially refused to carry the ruby to the seamstress because he wanted to join his friends in Egypt. He also expressed a dislike for boys when the Happy Prince asked for help for the seamstress’s little boy. However, upon seeing the Happy Prince’s sorrowful state, the swallow changed his mind and agreed to stay for the night.

Q15. How did the swallow reach the seamstress’s house?
Ans: The swallow flew over the town’s roofs, passing the cathedral tower adorned with white marble angels. He glided over the palace and the river before finally reaching the seamstress’s house. 

As he flew, he noticed the lanterns hanging from the ships’ masts. Upon arriving, he saw a boy tossing in bed with a fever, while his exhausted mother slept nearby. The swallow hopped in and placed a great ruby beside the woman’s thimble. He then gently fanned the boy’s forehead with his wings, bringing him relief. The boy remarked, “How cool I feel! I must be getting better,” before drifting into a peaceful slumber. Afterwards, the swallow returned to the Happy Prince and shared what he had done. The Prince noted, “It is curious, but I feel quite warm now, although it is so cold,” highlighting the warmth of doing good deeds.

Q16. What did the swallow overhear while going to the seamstress’s house?
Ans: As the swallow flew past the palace, he noticed a beautiful girl on the balcony. She expressed her hope that her dress would be ready for the upcoming state ball. She mentioned that she had ordered flowers to be embroidered on it but complained that the seamstresses were quite lazy.

Q17. Why and how did the Happy Prince help the seamstress?
Ans: The Happy Prince chose to help a poor seamstress who was exhausted and had a sick son. The woman struggled to afford food and medicine for her child, providing him only with water. To alleviate her suffering, the Prince asked the swallow to take the ruby from his sword hilt. This would enable the seamstress to escape her poverty and purchase the necessary supplies for her son.

Q18. Why does the Happy Prince send a ruby for the seamstress? What does the swallow do in the seamstress’s house? (Textual)
Ans: The Happy Prince sends a ruby to the seamstress to alleviate her poverty, enabling her to purchase food and medicine for her sick son. The swallow places the ruby on the table next to the woman’s thimble. Then, he gently flies around the boy’s bed, using his wings to fan the boy’s forehead.

Q19. Why couldn’t the poor seamstress sit beside her ailing son?
Ans: The poor seamstress had to work tirelessly to finish a gown for the Queen’s most beautiful maid of honour, which was needed for the upcoming court ball. Exhausted and hungry, she eventually fell asleep at her table, leaving her ailing son alone in bed, tossing and turning with fever.

Q20. What change came over the bird on his return from the seamstress’s house? Why?
Ans: After returning from the seamstress’s house, the swallow felt a sense of warmth despite the cold weather. The Happy Prince explained that this warmth resulted from his good deed.

Q21. What did the swallow do before planning for his flight towards Egypt on the second night?
Ans: The swallow bathed in the river at dawn and spent the day exploring the city’s monuments. He rested for a long time on top of the church steeple. Later, he approached the Prince to ask if he had any commissions for Egypt. The Prince, who had gone blind, instructed the swallow to remove the gold from his body, leaf by leaf, and give it to the poor and needy.

Q22. How did the swallow become the Prince’s eyes?
Ans: The swallow chose to stay with the blind Prince instead of leaving for Egypt. He flew over the city, observing its people and their struggles. The swallow reported their misery to the Prince, who instructed him to take the golden leaves from his statue to help those in need. This act of kindness allowed the swallow to become the Prince’s eyes, enabling him to see the world and its suffering.

Q23. The little Swallow grew colder and colder but kept up his determination. How did the bird show his great strength and courage?
Ans: The little swallow grew colder due to the snow and frost, yet he remained by the Happy Prince because of his deep love for him. To stay warm, he picked up crumbs from outside the baker’s shop and flapped his wings. His strength and courage were evident as he chose to stay beside the Prince despite the harsh cold, risking his own life in the process.

Q24. What did the swallow do when he realised that he was going to die? How did the Prince respond?
Ans: Upon realizing he was nearing death, the swallow summoned his remaining strength and flew to the Prince’s shoulder. He bid farewell and asked to kiss the Prince’s hand. The Prince, believing the swallow was departing for Egypt, welcomed this request and asked for a kiss on his lips instead, expressing his love.

The swallow clarified, “I am not going to Egypt; I am heading to the House of Death. Death is the brother of Sleep, isn’t it?” He then kissed the Happy Prince on the lips and fell dead at his feet.

Q25. Why was a cracking sound heard when the swallow died? OR What happened when the little swallow fell down dead at the feet of the Happy Prince?
Ans: The Happy Prince loved the swallow deeply. When the bird kissed the Prince and fell dead at his feet, the Prince’s leaden heart broke with a curious cracking sound. This moment marked a profound loss, as the heart shattered into two pieces.

Q26. What happened to the Prince’s heart? Why?
Ans: As the swallow fell dead at the feet of the Prince, the latter’s lead heart broke into two. This occurred because the Prince loved the bird dearly. Despite the harsh winter, the heart shattered due to its deep sorrow.

Q27. What made the Happy Prince look shabby and beggarly? OR Why did the Mayor and Town Councillors comment that the Prince looked ‘little better than a beggar’?
Ans: The gold leaves that adorned the statue of the Happy Prince were gradually given away in charity. In addition to this, his sapphire eyes and the red ruby from his sword hilt were also donated. As a result, the statue appeared shabby and beggarly.

Q28. Why did the Town Councillors decide to pull down the statue of the Happy Prince? OR How did the Mayor and his Councillors react to seeing the statue of the Happy Prince?
Ans: The Mayor and the Town Councillors were shocked to see the statue of the Happy Prince, which had become dull and shabby. The statue was missing its sapphire eyes and the ruby from its sword hilt, and its gold leaves had faded. They decided to pull it down because it looked too beggarly and was no longer beautiful or useful.

Q29. What strange thing was observed by the overseer?
Ans: The statue of the Happy Prince was taken down and sent to be melted in a furnace. At that moment, the overseer at the foundry noticed something unusual: the broken lead heart of the Prince did not melt and had to be discarded with the dust.

Q30. What happened to the leaden heart of the Happy Prince after it was thrown away?
Ans: After the Happy Prince’s leaden heart was thrown away, it did not melt in the foundry. Instead, it was discarded on a dust-heap alongside the dead swallow. Later, God’s Angels chose both the heart and the swallow as the most precious items in the city.

Q31. What are the two most precious things mentioned in the story? Why are they precious? OR What did the Angel consider the two most precious things in the city? Why?
Ans: The two most precious things mentioned in the story are the lead heart of the Happy Prince and the dead swallow. They are considered precious because the Angel selects them for their virtues and noble deeds. God rewards them by granting them a place in His garden of Paradise.

Q32. What is the moral of the story “The Happy Prince”?
Ans: The moral of the story is that charity and compassion bring us closer to God. The virtues of love, sacrifice, and pity should guide humanity. True beauty lies not in outward appearances but in a heart that cares for others.

Q33. What made the Happy Prince cry?
Ans: The Happy Prince cried because he could see the misery in the city. His heart, made of lead, felt heavy as he witnessed the sorrows of the poor people around him. Despite being a beautiful statue covered in gold, he was deeply affected by the pain and suffering he observed, which led him to weep.

Q34. To whom did the prince send his ruby and why?
Ans: The prince sent his ruby to a poor seamstress because her son was ill and longed for oranges. Lacking money, the mother could only provide him with river water. The prince wished to help her by sending the ruby.

Q35. How did the prince and the swallow enable the playwright to finish his work?
Ans: The playwright was cold and hungry, which prevented him from finishing his play. The Prince asked the swallow to deliver one of his sapphires to the playwright. This act of kindness enabled the playwright to sell the sapphire, buy firewood, and complete his work.

Q36. How did the prince help the match-girl? What was the result?
Ans: The prince sent a sapphire to the match-girl, which made her very happy. As a result, she ran home, laughing.

Q37. Why did the swallow decide not to leave the prince?
Ans: The swallow chose to stay with the prince because he had given away the sapphires from his eyes to help the poor, leaving him completely blind. Moved by the prince’s selflessness, the swallow decided to remain by his side.

Q38. How did the prince and the swallow help the poor?
Ans: The swallow informed the Prince about the suffering of the people in his city. In response, the Prince asked the swallow to remove gold and jewels from his body. He instructed the swallow to give these precious items to the poor, helping them in their time of need.

Q39. What did the angel consider ‘the two most precious things in the city’?
Ans: The angel considered the lead heart and the dead swallow to be the two most precious things in the city.

Q40. When the prince was alive, he did not know what tears were. Why?
Ans: The prince lived in a palace where no sorrow was allowed. Because he was shielded from sadness, he never experienced it and, therefore, did not know what tears were.

Q41. What was the boy’s mother doing when the swallow flew into the room? Where did he put the ruby? Why did the boy feel cool?
Ans: The boy’s mother had fallen asleep due to exhaustion. The swallow placed the ruby on a table next to her thimble. He then gently fanned the boy with his wings, making him feel cool and comfortable.

Q42. What made the playwright happy?
Ans: The playwright was filled with happiness upon discovering a sapphire on the table beside him. He believed it had been sent by a great admirer, which brought him immense joy. This newfound appreciation inspired him to continue working on his play.

Q43. Describe the sufferings of poor people in the city. How did the Happy Prince help them?
Ans: The poor people in the city endured a miserable existence. One such individual was a seamstress who had nothing to give her sick son. In response, the Happy Prince sent her a ruby. Another was a playwright who lacked firewood to stay warm; the prince sent him a sapphire. There was also a match-girl without shoes or stockings, whose matches had fallen into the gutter, leaving her in tears. The prince sent her his second sapphire. Additionally, there were hungry and homeless children, to whom the prince gave all the gold leaves from his body.

Q44. Give a brief character sketch of the Happy Prince.
Ans: The Happy Prince was a striking statue, adorned with gold and embellished with sapphires for eyes and a ruby in his sword. Despite his beautiful appearance, he was deeply aware of the suffering of the poor people in his city. His heart ached for them, and he shed tears for their misery. In his desire to help, he selflessly gave away his precious gems and gold, becoming blind and losing his beauty. However, he found true happiness in serving others. The Happy Prince realised that genuine joy comes from helping those in need. In recognition of his kindness, God blessed him and kept him in his city of gold.

Q45. Give a brief character sketch of the swallow.
Ans: The swallow was very much like the Happy Prince, possessing a kind heart. It noticed the tears in the prince’s eyes, and its heart filled with pity. Wanting to help, the swallow abandoned its plans to fly to Egypt and chose to stay with the prince on cold nights. When the prince lost his sight, the swallow decided to remain with him forever. Eventually, it died, but even in death, it could not be separated from the prince, as both were taken to heaven together.

Q1. On what condition did the guru and his disciple agree to rule the kingdom?

Ans: The guru and his disciple agreed to rule the kingdom on the condition that they could change all the existing laws. They aimed to restore normalcy by reversing the order of night and day and adjusting the prices of goods, ensuring that everything returned to a more reasonable state.

Q2. Why did the guru want to leave the kingdom quickly? Why did the disciple stay on?

Ans: The guru, being wise, sensed danger in remaining in the kingdom of fools and wanted to leave quickly. In contrast, the disciple chose to stay because everything was incredibly cheap, and he was primarily interested in enjoying good food at low prices. Despite the guru’s warnings about the foolishness of the people, the disciple’s desire for affordable meals kept him from leaving.

Q3. What was foolish about the king’s trial of the merchant?

Ans: The king’s decision to execute the merchant for the accidental death of a thief was foolish. The thief died when a wall collapsed on him, yet the king held the merchant responsible, demonstrating a lack of reason and justice.

Q4. Who was finally blamed for the crime and why?

Ans: The rich merchant was ultimately blamed for the crime because his deceased father had ordered faulty jewellery. Since his father was no longer alive, the merchant was held accountable in his place.

Q5. Now justice had come full circle, thought the king. What argument did the merchant come up with? What counter-argument did the king give?

Ans: The merchant argued that he should not be punished because it was his father who had ordered the jewellery, not him. He claimed innocence, stating, “He’s dead! I’m innocent!” However, the king responded by saying that the merchant had inherited both his father’s wealth and his sins, making him equally responsible for the crime.

Q6. Why was it decided to execute the disciple?

Ans: The king decided to execute the disciple because the rich merchant was too thin to be properly executed on the stake. The king ordered his servants to find a man who was fat enough to fit the stake. They soon found the disciple, who had become overweight from indulging in food.

When the disciple protested his innocence, claiming to be a sanyasi, the guards replied that it was the royal decree to find a suitable man for execution. As he awaited his fate, he remembered his guru’s warning about the foolishness of the city. Ultimately, the king and his minister decided that someone must be punished, and despite the disciple’s innocence, he was chosen for execution.

Q7. How did the kingdom become normal again?

Ans: The people of the kingdom sought the guru and his disciples to take on the roles of king and minister. They agreed, but only if they could change the old laws. Once they took charge, they restored order, ensuring that night was night and day was day, bringing the kingdom back to normal.

Q8. How did the guru get rid of the foolish king?

Ans: The guru outsmarted the foolish king by persuading him that whoever died first on the stake would be reborn as the king. The gullible king believed this and chose to have himself executed, thinking it would guarantee his return as the ruler.

Q9. What did the dancing girl say in her defense?

Ans: The dancing girl defended herself by stating that she had given gold to the goldsmith to create jewellery. However, the goldsmith delayed the work, causing her to walk back and forth in front of his house multiple times.

Q10. How did the guru come to know that his disciple was in trouble?

Ans: The guru, endowed with magical powers, had a vision that revealed his disciple was in danger. This ability allowed him to see not only the present but also the future. Upon realising his disciple’s plight, he arrived swiftly to offer assistance, having been alerted by his vision.

Q11. What did the king and his minister do at night?

Ans: At night, the king and his minister secretly freed the guru and the disciple from prison. They disguised themselves as the two prisoners and were executed in their place, following a plan they had arranged with loyal servants.

Q12. Who were the people questioned during the course of the trial, and what was each person’s defense?

Ans: The first person questioned was the house owner, who claimed that the bricklayer was responsible for constructing a faulty wall. The bricklayer then shifted the blame to the dancing girl, stating that her presence distracted him while he worked. In response, the dancing girl pointed to the goldsmith, saying he delayed her jewellery order. The goldsmith explained that he was under pressure to complete jewellery for a wealthy man’s wedding, which turned out to be the original house owner.

Q13. Why did the guru want him and his disciple to die first?

Ans: The guru suggested that whoever died first on the stake would be reborn as a king and minister. He feigned weariness from his ascetic lifestyle and expressed a desire to die first, hoping to enjoy the privileges of rulership in his next life.

Q14. Who became the king and the minister of the kingdom in the end? Why?

Ans: The guru and his disciple became the king and minister after the foolish king and his minister died. The people, worried about the future of their kingdom, urged them to take on these roles. They agreed, but only if they could change the old laws.

From that point on, the natural order was restored: night was night, and day was day, making the kingdom more like any other place.

Q15. How did the king and his minister die in place of the guru and his disciple?

Ans: The king ordered the executioners to kill the first two men they sent the next morning. That night, he and his minister secretly freed the guru and his disciple, disguising themselves as them. The following morning, the king and minister were executed in their place.

Q16. How was the Kingdom of Fools different from any other place?

Ans: The Kingdom of Fools was unique because it was governed by a foolish king and minister. In this kingdom, the people worked at night and slept during the day. Surprisingly, all goods, regardless of their value, were priced the same—only one duddu.

Q17. What are the two strange things the guru and his disciple found in the Kingdom of Fools?

Ans: The two strange things observed by the guru and his disciple in the Kingdom of Fools were that people and cattle worked at night and slept during the day. Additionally, everything, regardless of its actual value, was sold for just one duddu. This unusual system amazed the visitors, as they could buy all the food they wanted for a single rupee.

Q18. Why didn’t the people go against the order of the king and minister?

Ans: The people feared disobeying the king and minister because they were warned that anyone who did would face the death penalty.

Q19. Why did the guru not want to stay in the Kingdom of Fools?

Ans: The guru, being wise, recognised that living among fools was perilous due to their unpredictability. He understood that their foolish system of governance would not endure for long.

Q20. Why did the disciple not want to leave the Kingdom of Fools?

Ans: The disciple did not want to leave the Kingdom of Fools because he enjoyed the cheap food available there. In this peculiar place, everything cost just one duddu, whether it was a measure of rice or a bunch of bananas. This made it easy for him to eat well without spending much money.

Q21. Why did the thief’s brother accuse the rich merchant?

Ans: The thief’s brother accused the rich merchant because the thief was killed when a wall in the merchant’s old house collapsed. The brother believed this was due to poor construction and held the merchant responsible for his brother’s death.

Q22. Who was blamed by the merchant for the death of the thief?

Ans: The merchant held the bricklayer responsible for the death of the thief. He claimed that the bricklayer had constructed a faulty wall during the time of the merchant’s father, which ultimately led to the thief’s demise.

Q23. Why was the bricklayer found not guilty?

Ans: The bricklayer was found not guilty because he explained that he was distracted by a dancing girl. She was walking up and down the street, jingling her anklets, which made it difficult for him to focus on his work.

Q24. What was ironic about the king’s judgment holding the dancing girl as the culprit?

Ans: The irony in the king’s judgment is that he called the thief “innocent” and expressed sympathy for him, while blaming the dancing girl for the death of a lawbreaker. This reflects a complete lack of reason in his decision-making process.

Q25. How did the goldsmith escape punishment?

Ans: The goldsmith escaped punishment by claiming he had delayed the dancing girl‘s jewellery because he was busy fulfilling an urgent order for a wealthy merchant preparing for a wedding. He explained that the merchant’s impatience had forced him to prioritise that order over the dancer’s request.

Q26. Why were the people of the kingdom confused when they saw the dead bodies of the king and his minister?

Ans: The people were confused upon seeing the dead bodies of the king and his minister because they were unaware of the secret plan devised by the two leaders. This left them without a ruler and uncertain about how to proceed.

Q27. Who was the real culprit according to the king? Why did he escape punishment?

Ans: The king concluded that the real culprit was the rich merchant’s father, who had constructed the wall. However, since the father had already passed away, the king decided that the punishment should fall on his son.

Q28. What problem arose before the final execution of the criminal?

Ans: Before the merchant’s execution, it was revealed that he was too thin to fit on the stake. This created a significant problem, as the execution orders could not be fulfilled.

Q29. Why did the king’s servants catch the disciple?

Ans: The king’s servants captured the disciple because they needed a fat man for the execution. The disciple had become overweight after indulging in cheap food for several months.

Q30. What was the fight between the guru and his disciple about? Why?

Ans: The guru and his disciple argued over who should be the first to die at the stake. This was part of a clever plan to deceive the king into believing that the one who died first would become the next ruler. The disciple, motivated by his desire for food, initially found himself in this predicament, but the guru intervened to save him.

When the guru insisted on being executed first, the disciple protested, leading to a chaotic scene that confused the king. The guru explained that they sought to die together, as they had never encountered a city or king like this one. Ultimately, they managed to trick the king and escape their fate.

Q1: What was Mahendra’s profession, and what were his responsibilities at work?

Ans: Mahendra worked as a junior supervisor in a company that specialized in providing supervisors for various construction projects. His main responsibility was to oversee and monitor the activities happening at different construction sites, which included factories, bridges, and dams. He was required to frequently move from one worksite to another based on instructions from his head office, ensuring that everything was running smoothly and according to the company’s standards.

Q2: Describe Iswaran’s role in Mahendra’s daily life and work routine.

Ans: Iswaran played a vital role in Mahendra’s life, not only as his cook but also as his companion. He accompanied Mahendra to every worksite, taking care of his daily needs, which included cooking meals, washing clothes, and maintaining the household. Apart from his domestic duties, Iswaran entertained Mahendra by narrating captivating stories filled with drama, suspense, and unexpected twists. His ability to make even the most mundane tasks seem interesting made him an indispensable part of Mahendra’s life.

Q3: How did Iswaran narrate stories, and what impact did his storytelling have on Mahendra?

Ans: Iswaran had a unique way of telling stories, often building up suspense and concluding with surprise endings. His style was heavily influenced by Tamil authors, and he would bring dramatic expressions, sound effects, and theatrical pauses into his narratives. Mahendra was deeply captivated by Iswaran’s storytelling. He would listen to these stories with complete fascination, without questioning their authenticity. Iswaran’s vivid imagination and skillful narration made a significant impact on Mahendra, as he eagerly anticipated each new tale.

Q4: What incident caused Mahendra to decide to leave the haunted place?

Ans: One night, Mahendra was woken by an eerie moaning sound. When he looked out of his window, he saw a dark, cloudy figure clutching a bundle, which resembled the ghost that Iswaran had described in one of his stories. This terrifying sight deeply disturbed Mahendra, and he was convinced that the place was haunted. The fear and anxiety from this experience made Mahendra decide to resign from his job and leave the site immediately.

Q5: How did Mahendra react when Iswaran revealed his own sighting of the female ghost?

Ans: When Iswaran casually mentioned that he had heard the same moaning sound from Mahendra’s room and implied that Mahendra had seen the ghost, Mahendra was overcome with fear. The realization that Iswaran’s ghost story might be true chilled him to the core. The combination of the terrifying sighting and Iswaran’s confirmation led Mahendra to hastily submit his resignation and make plans to leave the place, as he could no longer bear to stay in such a haunted location.

Q6: Describe Iswaran’s ability to produce vegetables and other ingredients in remote locations.

Ans: Iswaran possessed an extraordinary skill of producing fresh vegetables and other cooking ingredients, even in remote locations where there were no shops or markets for miles around. This “magical” ability amazed Mahendra, as Iswaran could whip up delicious meals within a short time after arriving at any new worksite, seemingly out of thin air. His resourcefulness added to the mystique of his character.

Q7: What chaos did the elephant cause before Iswaran was able to control it?

Ans: The elephant, a wild tusker, had escaped from a timber yard and wandered into a nearby town, causing panic and chaos. It roamed the streets, scaring people and destroying property. Eventually, the elephant entered the grounds of a school, where children were playing. In its rage, the tusker uprooted the football goalpost, tore down the volleyball net, and smashed a large water drum. The frightened schoolchildren rushed into their classrooms and bolted the doors, while the townspeople watched helplessly, unsure how to stop the rampaging elephant.

Q8: Do you believe the ghost that Mahendra saw was just a trick played by Iswaran? Provide reasons for your answer.

Ans: It is highly possible that the ghost Mahendra saw was part of an elaborate trick played by Iswaran. First, Iswaran had set the stage by telling Mahendra that the site they lived on was a former burial ground. Then, he narrated a story about a female ghost to fuel Mahendra’s imagination. On the night in question, Mahendra saw a figure resembling the ghost Iswaran had described. The following morning, Iswaran confirmed that Mahendra had indeed seen the ghost, further cementing the idea in his mind. These events suggest that Iswaran may have orchestrated the entire scenario to play a trick on his master.

Q9: What was Iswaran’s usual routine after Mahendra left for work?

Ans: After Mahendra left for work each day, Iswaran would start his routine by tidying up the living quarters and washing Mahendra’s clothes. He would then take a bath and prepare his lunch. After finishing his meal, Iswaran would often indulge in reading for a while before taking a nap. His ability to vividly describe what he read added flair to his otherwise simple routine, making it seem more engaging and creative.

Q10: Although Mahendra believed that ghosts were a figment of the imagination, what happened to him on a full moon night?

Ans: Mahendra was a firm skeptic and often dismissed the idea of ghosts or spirits as nothing more than figments of the imagination. However, one day Iswaran told him about a female ghost carrying a foetus in her arms, which had supposedly been sighted in the area. On a full moon night, Mahendra woke up from his sleep to the sound of moaning. When he looked outside his window, he was shocked and terrified to see a figure resembling the ghost that Iswaran had described. This experience caused him to break into a cold sweat and question his previous disbelief.

Q11: Describe Mahendra’s character in about 30-40 words.

Ans: Mahendra was a simple and hardworking man who led a modest life. He worked as a junior supervisor in a construction firm, frequently relocating to different sites as per his job’s demands. He was sincere, dedicated to his work, and kind-hearted toward Iswaran, his loyal companion and cook.

Q12: What destruction did the elephant cause in the schoolyard?

Ans: In its rampage, the elephant broke through the brick wall of the schoolyard. It pulled out the football goalpost, tore down the volleyball net, and trampled the water drum placed in the yard. The tusker also uprooted several shrubs, leaving the schoolyard in ruins.

Q13: Why did Iswaran request permission to cook a special dinner?

Ans: Iswaran asked Mahendra for permission to prepare a special dinner because it was an auspicious day when, according to tradition, people cooked special dishes to offer to the spirits of their ancestors. However, Iswaran had another motive: he was setting the stage for one of his ghost stories by creating a spooky atmosphere.

Q14: What did Iswaran tell Mahendra about the factory area where they were staying?

Ans: Iswaran informed Mahendra that the area around the factory where they were staying had once been a burial ground. He claimed to have found bones and human skulls scattered along the paths and even mentioned that he had seen a female ghost in the area. This story served to add a sense of eeriness to their surroundings.

Q15: Can you suggest an alternate ending for the story?

Ans: An alternative ending could be that Mahendra realizes Iswaran played a trick on him with the ghost story. Instead of resigning from his job, Mahendra confronts Iswaran and uncovers the truth behind the supposed haunting. Iswaran, feeling guilty, apologizes for his actions and promises to stop telling such stories in the future. They continue to live together peacefully, with Iswaran focusing more on his culinary talents rather than storytelling.

Q1. Why did Toto throw a plate at Grandmother?

Ans: Toto, the monkey, saw a large plate of pulao on the dining table and began to eat it. When Grandmother entered and noticed him, she screamed in surprise. Upset by her reaction, Toto threw the plate at her, causing it to shatter into pieces.

Q2. “Toto was a pretty monkey”. In what sense was Toto pretty?

Ans: Toto was a pretty monkey due to his adorable appearance. His bright, sparkling eyes and deep-set eyebrows added to his charm. His pearly white teeth often showed in a smile that could surprise anyone. Additionally, his long tail enhanced his overall good looks.

Q3. How did Toto use his body parts to his advantage?

Ans: Toto cleverly utilised his bright eyes to display a mischievous glint. His pearly white teeth often formed a smile that frightened elderly Anglo-Indian ladies. With his quick, mischievous fingers, he could snatch items swiftly. Additionally, his tail acted as a third hand, enabling him to hang from branches or retrieve objects that were out of reach.

Q4. Why was Toto sold back to the tonga-driver?

Ans: Grandfather realised that Toto could not be kept in the house for long. The family faced constant losses of dishes, clothes, curtains, and wallpaper due to Toto’s mischievous behaviour. Ultimately, Grandfather decided to sell Toto back to the tonga-driver for just three rupees.

Q5. How does Toto come to Grandfather’s private zoo?

Ans: Grandfather, who had a fondness for pets, saw a red monkey tied up by a tonga driver. Feeling pity for the monkey, he decided to buy him for five rupees to include him in his private zoo, which housed various birds and animals.

Q6. What did Toto do in the author’s room?

Ans: Toto created chaos in the author’s room by tearing down the ornamental paper on the walls, exposing the bare bricks. He managed to pull the peg he was tied to from the wall, freeing himself. In his frenzy, he also shredded the author’s school blazer, leaving the room in a mess.

Q7. Where was Toto transferred from the author’s bedroom? Did he remain peaceful there?

Ans:  Toto was transferred to a large cage in the servants’ quarters, where Grandfather kept other animals from his private zoo, including a tortoise, a pair of rabbits, a pet squirrel, and the narrator’s goat. However, Toto’s mischievous behaviour disturbed the peace of the other pets, prompting Grandfather to take him to Saharanpur instead.

Q8. Describe how Grandfather took Toto with him to Saharanpur.

Ans: Grandfather travelled to Saharanpur to collect his pension, taking Toto along because it was hard to keep him hidden from Grandmother, and he was disruptive at night. Toto was concealed in a large black canvas bag lined with straw, which served as his temporary home during the train journey. Despite being confined, Toto’s attempts to escape caused the bag to roll and jump, attracting the attention of curious onlookers at the Dehra Dun railway station. While Grandfather was showing his ticket at the railway turnstile, Toto unexpectedly poked his head out, surprising the ticket collector. Although Grandfather tried to explain that Toto was not a dog, the collector insisted on charging a fare for him. In a humorous twist, Grandfather asked about the fare for a tortoise he had, which the collector deemed free. Ultimately, after the trip, Grandfather sold Toto back to the tonga-driver for just three rupees.

Q9. How many pets did the author’s grandfather have? Where were they kept?

Ans: The author’s grandfather had a total of six pets, which he kept in his own little zoo at home. This collection included a tortoise, a pair of rabbits, a tame squirrel, and the narrator’s pet goat. The latest addition was Toto, the monkey, and he also had a donkey.

Q10. How did Toto behave with Nana, the donkey?

Ans: Toto was a mischievous monkey who caused quite a bit of trouble for both the animals and the family. On his first night with Nana, the donkey, chaos ensued. When Grandfather checked on them, he found that Toto had bitten Nana’s long ears with his sharp teeth. This incident clearly showed that they would never become friends.

Q11. Why did Grandfather hide Toto for some time when he brought him home?

Ans: Grandfather, who had a fondness for pets, often encountered opposition from Grandmother whenever he brought new animals home. To prevent any conflict, he chose to keep Toto hidden for a time, waiting for a moment when Grandmother would be in a better mood to reveal his arrival.

Q12. Where was Toto kept immediately after Grandfather got him? Why?

Ans: Toto was kept in a closet that opened into the narrator’s bedroom wall. He was tied securely to a peg attached to the wall. This was done secretly because Grandmother would create a fuss whenever a new pet was brought into the house.

Q13. What destruction was caused by Toto to the narrator’s room?

Ans: Toto caused considerable damage in the narrator’s room. He ripped the ornamental paper from the walls, exposing the bare brick and plaster underneath. Furthermore, he forcefully pulled the peg from its socket, which was meant to secure him, and he also shredded the narrator’s blazer, leaving it in tatters.

Q14. How did Grandfather react when Toto destroyed things on his first day in the house?

Ans: Grandfather reacted positively to the chaos caused by Toto on his first day in the house. Instead of being angry, he found the damage amusing and admired the monkey’s cleverness. He joked that if he had more time, Toto could have tied the torn pieces of the blazer into a rope and escaped through the window. Grandfather’s light-hearted attitude showed that he appreciated Toto’s mischievous nature.

Q15. How did Toto behave when he was kept with the other pets of Grandfather?

Ans: Toto, the mischievous monkey, created chaos among the other pets in Grandfather’s care. He disturbed their sleep at night and even bit the donkey, Nana, when they were placed together in the stable. This behaviour made it clear that Toto was not a suitable companion for the other animals.

Q16. Where and why was Grandfather going the next day?

Ans: Grandfather lived in Dehra Dun and was travelling to Saharanpur the next day. As a retired man, he was going there to collect his pension.

Q17. Why did Grandfather decide to take Toto with him to Saharanpur?

Ans: Grandfather decided to take Toto with him to Saharanpur to keep his presence a secret from Grandmother. He feared that if Toto was left behind, he would likely create chaos, as he had done before when confined in a closet and with other pets.

Q18. How did Grandfather decide to carry Toto to Saharanpur? Why?

Ans: Grandfather decided to carry Toto to Saharanpur in a large black canvas kit bag because Toto was a very mischievous monkey. If he had not been securely zipped up, he would have certainly caused trouble. Additionally, the railway authorities prohibited carrying animals without permission.

Q19. How did Grandfather try to keep the presence of his travelling-mate a secret?

Ans: Grandfather took Toto, his monkey companion, on the journey to Saharanpur. To keep Toto’s presence a secret, he placed him in a large canvas kit bag filled with straw. The thick canvas prevented Toto from biting through it, and the tightly closed bag left no way for him to escape. Despite his efforts to get out, which caused the bag to roll around and attract attention, Toto remained hidden until they reached their destination.

Q20. “An exhibition attracted a curious crowd of onlookers at the Dehra Dun railway platform”. What was the cause of this exhibition?

Ans: The exhibition that attracted a curious crowd at the Dehra Dun railway platform was due to the antics of Toto, the mischievous monkey. He was packed inside a large black canvas kit-bag by the narrator’s grandfather. As Toto jumped and rolled around inside the bag, he created a commotion that caught the attention of passersby, leading to the gathering of onlookers.

Q21. How did the ticket collector learn about the presence of Toto?

Ans: Toto’s presence in the bag was unnoticed until the journey to Saharanpur. While Grandfather was having his ticket checked at the railway turnstile, Toto suddenly poked his head out and grinned at the ticket collector. This unexpected sight startled the collector, who, with quick thinking, informed Grandfather that he would need to pay for the monkey, mistaking him for a dog. Despite Grandfather’s attempts to clarify that Toto was a monkey and not a dog, the ticket collector insisted on classifying him as a dog, resulting in a fare of three rupees. In a humorous turn, Grandfather then took out their pet tortoise and asked what the fare would be for it, to which the ticket collector replied, “No charge. It is not a dog.”

Q22. What did the ticket collector classify Toto as? Why did he do so?

Ans: The railway ticket collector classified Toto as a dog because he unexpectedly poked his head out of the bag and grinned at him. According to the rules, only dogs were permitted to travel on the train, and they were required to pay a fare. Consequently, the ticket collector labelled Toto as a dog, resulting in a fare of three rupees.

Q23. Why did Grandfather get annoyed at the Saharanpur station?

Ans: Grandfather became annoyed at the Saharanpur station because the ticket collector insisted on calling Toto a dog. Despite Grandfather’s attempts to explain that Toto was a monkey and not a quadruped, the ticket collector classified him as a dog. Consequently, Grandfather had to pay a fare of three rupees for Toto.

Q24. Why did Grandfather show his tortoise to the ticket collector?

Ans: Grandfather was frustrated when the ticket collector insisted on calling Toto a dog and demanded a fare. In a moment of sarcasm, he took out the tortoise from his pocket and asked the ticket collector how much he should pay for it, since all animals were being charged. The ticket collector examined the tortoise closely, poked it with his finger, and, after a brief pause, declared there was no charge as it was not a dog.

Q25. Why didn’t the ticket collector charge for the tortoise?

Ans: The ticket collector did not charge for the tortoise because he concluded it was not a dog. According to railway rules, only dogs require a fee. This situation was amusing, especially since even Toto, the monkey, was mistaken for a dog by the collector.

Q26. When and where was Toto given a comfortable home?

Ans: When Toto was accepted by Grandmother, he was given a comfortable home in the stable. There, he had the family donkey, Nana, as his companion. On his first night, Grandfather visited to check on Toto’s comfort. To his surprise, he found Nana pulling away from a bundle of hay, with Toto clinging to her long ears. Despite their close quarters, Toto and Nana never became friends.

On cold winter evenings, Grandmother treated Toto to a large bowl of warm water for his bath. He would carefully test the temperature, stepping in gradually until he was submerged up to his neck.

Q27. Who was Nana? How did Toto trouble him?

Ans: Nana was the narrator’s family donkey. On his first night in the stable, Toto, the new monkey, caused trouble by biting Nana’s long ears with his sharp teeth. This behaviour startled Nana, making it hard for her to settle down.

Q28. Why couldn’t Toto and Nana become friends?

Ans: Toto and Nana could not become friends because Toto troubled Nana by clinging to her long ears with his sharp teeth. This behaviour upset the donkey, preventing any chance of friendship between them.

Q29. Describe Toto’s bath ritual. 
OR 
How did Toto take a bath during winter? How did he learn to bathe in that manner?

Ans: Toto enjoyed a warm bath during the cold winter evenings. His grandmother would provide a large bowl of warm water for him. He would carefully test the water’s temperature with his hand before stepping in, one foot at a time, just as he had seen the narrator do. Once comfortable, he would rub soap all over his body using his hands or feet. When the water cooled down, he would quickly jump out and rush to the kitchen fire to dry himself.

Q30. When and why would Toto refuse to take a bath?

Ans: Toto would refuse to take a bath if someone laughed at him while he was trying to dry himself by the kitchen fire. This mockery would hurt his feelings, making him unwilling to continue with his bath.

Q31. How did Toto’s love for warm baths almost lead to his being half-boiled?

Ans: One day, Toto found a large kitchen kettle left on the fire for tea. Curious, he removed the lid and discovered the water was warm enough for a bath. He climbed in, leaving only his head above the surface. At first, this was enjoyable, but soon the water began to boil. Toto hopped up and down, trying to escape the heat, until Grandmother arrived and rescued him, pulling out a half-boiled Toto from the kettle.

Q32. “The brain part devoted to mischief was far more developed in Toto”. Do you agree with this observation of the narrator? Support your answer with instances from the text.

Ans: Toto, an intelligent monkey, often directed his energy towards mischief, frequently causing destruction. His actions, such as tearing apart items and annoying those around him, support the narrator’s observation about Toto’s brain being more developed for mischief. For instance, he threw a plate at Grandmother during lunch and tore at the wallpaper, demonstrating his inclination towards chaos. These instances highlight how Toto’s behaviour aligns with the idea that a part of his brain was indeed dedicated to mischief.

Q33. What incident led to Grandfather’s decision not to keep Toto as a pet?

Ans: Toto once created a scene during lunchtime by gorging on pulao. When Grandmother and the narrator’s aunt shouted at him, Toto retaliated by throwing a plate and splashing a glass of water at them. He then escaped through a window, clutching the dish, and climbed a jackfruit tree. There, he savoured every grain of rice before tossing the dish down, shattering it on the ground. This incident made Grandfather realise that Toto was not a suitable pet, as they could not afford the constant damage he caused. Consequently, Grandfather sold Toto back to the tonga-driver for just three rupees.

Q34. Where did Grandfather finally send Toto, and what did it cost him?

Ans: Grandfather ultimately sold Toto back to the same tonga driver from whom he had originally purchased him. He had bought Toto for five rupees but could only sell him back for three rupees.

Q35. Why did Grandfather give away Toto, the monkey? 
OR
Why does the author say, “Toto was not the sort of pet we could keep for long”?

Ans: Toto could not be kept as a pet for long due to his hyperactive and mischievous nature. He was hard to train and frequently caused damage around the house. His antics resulted in the loss of dishes, clothes, curtains, and wallpaper, which the family could not afford. As a result, Grandfather decided to give him away to the tonga-driver for just three rupees.

Q36. Toto was not an animal that could be trained into a pet. Why?

Ans: Toto was a wild monkey, which explains why the tonga-driver kept him tied up. At Grandfather’s house, Toto caused so much mischief that it became clear he was destructive and could not be trained as a pet. His behaviour demonstrated that he was not suited for domestic life.

Q37. Where was Toto transferred to after he wrenched the peg from the wall?

Ans: Toto was transferred to a large cage in the servants’ quarters, where he lived with several of Grandfather’s pets, including a tortoise, a pair of rabbits, and a tame squirrel. However, Toto was quite disruptive at night, preventing his companions from sleeping. As a result, Grandfather decided to take him along to Saharanpur the next day.

Q1. Where did the child go with his parents? What did he want there?

Ans: The child went to a fair with his parents to celebrate the festival of spring. At the fair, he wanted:

• Sweets, especially burfi
• Garlands of flowers
• Balloons in various colours
• To see the snake charmer’s show
• To ride on a roundabout

Despite his wishes, he knew his parents would not buy these items for him.

Q2. Was the fair popular with people in general? Give reasons.

Ans: The fair was very popular with people for several reasons:

• Visitors left their daily routines to enjoy the spring festival.
• Many dressed in their best clothes, adding to the festive atmosphere.
• Families gathered together, creating a sense of community.
• The stalls and rides attracted large crowds, enhancing the overall experience.

Q3. Parents were in a hurry to reach the fair, but the child was delaying them. How?

Ans: The child was easily distracted on the way to the fair. His behaviour included:

• Stopping at toy shops to admire the toys.
• Chasing after butterflies and insects.
• Gathering flowers that fell around him.

As a result, his parents had to frequently pause and call him to walk alongside them.

Q4. What are the things that the child sees on his way to the fair? Why does he lag behind?

Ans: The child sees several things on his way to the fair:

• Toys
• Insects
• Worms
• Flowers

He is captivated by these items and often stops to admire them. As a result, he struggles to keep up with his parents and ends up lagging behind.

Q5. How did the child’s father react to hearing the child say, “I want that toy.”?

Ans: The child was accustomed to his parents, particularly his father, often denying his wishes. When he expressed his desire for a toy, his father responded with a red-eyed glare, resembling a tyrant. This look conveyed a clear and rude ‘no’.

Q6. How can you say that the child was scared of his father?

Ans: The child showed signs of being scared of his father through his behaviour. Although he desired many things, he expressed his wishes in slow murmurs. This indicates that he felt intimidated and unable to voice his demands confidently, unlike other children.

Q7. How did the mother distract the child’s mind from the toy seller?

Ans: The child’s mother redirected his attention to the flowering mustard field to distract him from the toy seller. In this vibrant setting, he noticed:

• Colourful dragonflies with striking purple wings
• Black bees and butterflies fluttering around

He watched them as they danced in the air, captivated by their movements.

Q8. How did the child enjoy the beauty of nature on his way to the fair?

Ans: On his way to the fair, the child enjoyed the beauty of nature by:

• Stopping to admire a flowering mustard field.
• Watching insects and worms emerge from their hiding spots.
• Gathering the petals of falling flowers.
• Running joyfully in circles around a banyan tree.

Q9. Why did the child stop to watch the insects and what were his parents doing at that time?

Ans: The child stopped to watch the insects and worms along the footpath because they were coming out to enjoy the warmth of the sun. Meanwhile, his parents were resting under the shade of the trees.

Q10. What happened when the little child entered the grove? How did he enjoy it there?

Ans: Upon entering the grove, a shower of young flowers fell on the child. He became so enchanted that he forgot about his parents and started gathering the petals.

As he played, he heard the cooing of doves and excitedly ran back to his parents, dropping the flowers he had collected.

His parents called out to him, and he joyfully ran around the banyan tree, continuing to gather the petals that had fallen.

Q11. Why did the child feel both repelled and fascinated by the fair?

Ans: The child felt both repelled and fascinated by the fair for several reasons:

• The large crowd at the fair made him feel confused and slightly afraid.
• He was captivated by the natural sights, food stalls, rides, games, and toys.
• The vibrant atmosphere created a mix of emotions, drawing him in while also overwhelming him.

Q12. What did the child see at the sweetmeat shop? How did he react to this sight?

Ans: At the sweetmeat shop at the fair’s entrance, the child saw a stunning display of colourful sweets that made his eyes widen and his mouth water. He craved his favourite burfi but instinctively knew his parents would not buy it for him. So, he moved on without waiting for a response.

Q13. Why didn’t the child wait for an answer after he had pleaded for sweets?

Ans: The child saw his favourite sweet, burfi, and eagerly murmured, “I want that burfi.” However, he did not wait for a response because:

• He anticipated his parents would refuse.
• He feared they would call him greedy.

Thus, he moved on without expecting an answer.

Q14. Why couldn’t the child get a garland of flowers for himself?

Ans: The child wanted a garland of Gulmohar flowers but spoke in a half-murmur. He was aware that his parents would likely refuse, claiming the flowers were cheap.

Q15. How did balloons fascinate the child? Was he able to buy any? Why/Why not?

Ans: The child was captivated by the sight of colourful balloons soaring from a vendor’s pole. His heart swelled with a strong desire to own them all. However, he refrained from asking his parents to buy any because he feared they would say he was too old for such things.

• The balloons mesmerised him with their vibrant colours.
• He felt a deep longing to possess them.
• He did not ask his parents due to the fear of a negative response.
• His parents would likely deem him too old for balloons.

Q16. How did the sight of a snake-charmer leave the child spellbound?

Ans: As the child walked away from the balloon-seller, he spotted a snake-charmer playing a flute to a snake. He was captivated by the snake’s hood, which swayed gracefully like a swan’s neck. The enchanting music mesmerised both the snake and the boy.

Q17. Why didn’t the child ask his parents to show him the snake charmer’s act even though he wanted to?

Ans: The child did not ask his parents to see the snake charmer because he was aware that they considered the charmer’s music to be coarse. He felt there was no point in requesting something he knew they would refuse.

Q18. In the fair, the child wants many things. What are they? Why does he move on without waiting for an answer?

Ans: The boy desires several things at the fair:

• Toys
• Burfi (a type of sweet)
• A garland of flowers
• Balloons
• To hear the snake charmer’s music
• To ride on the roundabout

He moves on without waiting for an answer because he anticipates that his parents will refuse his requests, citing various reasons.

Q19. What did the child find difficult to resist? What did he do?

Ans: The child found it difficult to resist the roundabout, where men, women, and children were whirling around, shrieking with excitement. He watched them closely and, unable to hold back, made a bold request to his parents:

• “I want to go on the roundabout, please, Father, Mother.”

Q20. What plea did the child finally make to his parents? Was his plea heard?

Ans: The child finally pleaded with his parents to let him go on a ride on the roundabout. Unfortunately, his plea went unheard because his parents were not nearby at that moment. He had become separated from them, which meant they could not hear him.

Q21. The fair lost all its charm and attraction for the child. When did this happen?

Ans: Tempted by the sights of a sweetmeat seller, a balloon-seller, a flower-seller, a snake-charmer, and finally the roundabout, the child became distracted and lost track of his parents. This separation filled him with panic, leading him to lose interest in the fair.

Q22. Where did the lost child meet a kind-hearted person at the fair?

Ans: The lost child met a kind-hearted person near the shrine. The man noticed the child in the crowd, who was at risk of being trampled. Hearing the child’s cries, he quickly came to help and lifted him up.

Q23. How did the child react when there was no sign of his parents?

Ans: Upon realising he had lost his parents, the child felt confused and panicked. Unable to find them in the large crowd, he:

• Ran around, calling out for his mother and father.
• Felt lonely and afraid, leading him to cry inconsolably.
• Experienced tears rolling down his flushed face, overwhelmed by fear.

His distress escalated as he searched in every direction, feeling lost and desperate.

Q24. What happened when the lost child reached the temple door?

Ans: Upon reaching the temple door, the lost child found himself caught in the crowd. The people were jostling to enter the shrine, and he was knocked down.

He would have been trampled if a kind man had not heard his loud cry and rescued him.

Q25. Who rescued the lost child? What did he offer to buy?

Ans: A kind man in the shrine heard the child’s cry and lifted him into his arms. To comfort the distressed child, he offered to buy:

• sweets from the sweet shop
• balloons in bright colours
• flowers to make a garland

However, the child only wanted his mother and father.

Q26. Why did the man offer to buy things for the child?

Ans: The child was crying uncontrollably in the arms of the man who had rescued him from being trampled at the shrine. The man offered to buy him things to:

• Calm the child down.
• Make him feel secure.
• Inquire about his parents and home.

Q27. Why did the lost child refuse to take his favourite things in the fair after losing his parents? OR Why does the lost child lose interest in the things that he had wanted earlier?

Ans: The child refused to take his favourite things at the fair after losing his parents because he was overwhelmed with fear and panic. His mind was solely focused on finding his parents, causing him to lose interest in everything else, including the items he had previously wanted.

Q28. What was the child’s response to the many offers made by the man?

Ans: The child’s response to the man’s offers was one of deep distress:

• He wailed inconsolably, unable to be comforted.
• Amidst his sobs, he repeatedly cried, “I want my mother, I want my father!”
• He refused to look at the various items the man presented, showing no interest in them.

Q29. What kind of person was the man who rescued the child?

Ans: The man who rescued the child was a kind-hearted individual. His actions were a blessing in disguise for the lost child. Without his help, the vulnerable child could have been trampled and seriously harmed.

Q30. What do you think happens in the end? Does the child find his parents?

Ans: The lost child was lucky to be found by a kind stranger. This man made a special effort to locate the child’s parents and successfully reunited them.

Q31. How can you say that the child was an obedient boy?

Ans: The child was captivated by the fair, showing interest in many attractions. However, he did not pressure his parents to buy anything. Instead, he followed them closely, demonstrating his obedience. Although he desired various items, he refrained from voicing his wishes, knowing his parents would likely refuse.

Q32. Where did the child’s parents stop and why?

Ans: The child’s parents stopped under the shade of a grove to rest for a while during their journey to the fair.

Q33. How did the father try to distract the child’s mind from the toy seller?

Ans: The child saw a toy-seller at the fair and expressed his desire to buy toys. However, his father, known for his strictness, looked at him with anger. Understanding his father’s usual refusal, the child refrained from insisting on buying the toys.

Q34. Why did the parents forbid the child from listening to the snake charmer’s music?

Ans: The parents forbade the child from listening to the snake charmer’s music because they deemed it coarse. Despite his desire to hear the flute, the child suppressed his feelings and continued on his way.

Q35. How did the child react to seeing the sweet-seller?

Ans: At the fair, a man was selling a variety of sweets, including Gulab-Jamun, Rasgulla, Burfi, and Jalebi. The display was enticing, and when the child saw the sweets, his mouth began to water.

His favourite sweet was Burfi, so he expressed his desire to his parents, saying he wanted it. However, he knew they might not agree, as they often thought he was being greedy.